tomdkat
Forum Replies Created
-
Looks like we disagree on more than just what constitutes a “feature”. 🙂
I’m also a fan of open source software but I don’t think being “open source” gives the users the “freedom”. I think it’s the fact the software is free (as in no monetary cost) that partially gives people the “freedom” to find the best solutions for their requirements. For example, on Windows I have a choice of various free anti-virus applications yet none of them are open source.
What I like about WordPress is its architecture and popularity which attract developers to enhance it. Actually, I’m finding this is both good and bad but it is what it is. 🙂
Take care!
Peace…
Or they could simply use another plugin that offers more configurability or more reporting capability. Anti-spam was the first plugin I tried and maybe I simply need to find another or create a fork of anti-spam, as you mention above. 🙂
We clearly disagree on what a “feature” is. In any event, at the very least I know have a reference point that I can use in evaluating other spam prevention plugins.
Peace…
As I described above, my other blog hasn’t received any spam either because they haven’t been posting any. I haven’t received any spam on the blog in which I installed anti-spam. Is it because the plugin’s working? Probably. How do I know that? I really don’t. For all I know, after installing the plugin they might have suspended their spamming efforts. So, I can *think* it’s working but I really have no way of confirming it, other than deactivating the plugin and see if the spam comes back. Lack of feedback isn’t always a good thing.
I’m not saying you need to add many options and I’m not saying the plugin “needs” to be configurable in every way imaginable. I’m saying not providing _any_ feedback and not providing _any_ way of getting feedback to even confirm the plugin is working isn’t necessarily a “good” thing. That might be “by design”, as it is in this case, but that’s a different argument than it being a “feature” or not. 🙂
I mean how does anyone really know any piece of software is actually working? They get feedback from it. 🙂 How do you know a web page is loading? You see the feedback reported in the browser, and so on.
Here’s the thing: even if I was “lobbying” for the addition of basic reporting capability, that wouldn’t be heading toward an “options monster”. I mean the plugin is simple enough in function and intention, there’s not really much to control in terms of its _current_ functionality. Take the “simple login log” plugin as an example. It’s goal in life is to log login attempts. It’s got 2 options and that’s all it really needs. These options appear at the very bottom of the general settings deashboard page so they will be effectively ignored unless the user explicity needs access to the settings.
If users would rarely need to make any changes to the plugin, a single option to control whatever feedback is provided about the behavior of the plugin would be totally inocuous. It wouldn’t “clutter” anything and would be well worth avoiding the risks introduced by requiring editing a PHP file, possibly by someone who knows nothing about PHP. I mean, considering the point of this plugin, I can see those using it being those who don’t “have” to worry about configuring anything and possibly by those not comfortable editing PHP files.
In any event, once again, I’m not asking you to change anything. I stand by my review as I wrote it above. Having an optional basic reporting function would be nice and having a simple option to enable or disable this function would be even better. At the time I wrote the review above, I wasn’t aware of the setting in the PHP file you mentioned above.
Peace…
I understand the point of the plugin but not having ANY feedback at all doesn’t provide a way to confirm the plugin is actually working. For example, on another blog I maintain, I had a similar spam issue. I wasn’t getting as many as on the blog in which I installed “anti-spam” but I was getting spam. Then, it stopped. Since I didn’t change anything to WordPress, it’s obvious they spammers stopped trying to spam my blog, for whatever reason. However, if I had installed anti-spam, I wouldn’t know if the lack of spam was due to the plugin or to it not being posted to it.
I’m not asking that you change THIS plugin, I’m only saying it would be nice to have some kind of basic OPTIONAL reporting capability to give you some sense as to how much spam is actually being blocked. Ironically, I didn’t install this plugin because of the “forget about spam completely” aspect. This plugin was on a short list of plugins to try and it seemed to work well, which is why I reviewed it.
As for a plugin not having options as being a “feature”, I’m not sure I agree with that since there will ALWAYS be an aspect of the plugin that any given user will want to control, like the “send spam comments to admin email” option you mention above. Having to modify PHP code isn’t very “user friendly”. 🙂
In any event, I’m NOT complaining and I stand by my original review and my 5-star rating. Great job! 🙂
Peace…
I noticed today that the WP Maintenance Mode plugin seems to be gone completely from WordPress.org’s plugin site:
http://wordpress.org/plugins/wp-maintenance-mode/
Does anyone know if this plugin will no longer be maintained or developed?
Thanks!
Peace…
There is information in this thread:
http://wordpress.org/support/topic/wordpress-update-352-maintenance-mode-slow-down-site?replies=12
which allows WP Maintenance Mode to remain activated and eliminates the internal server error, at least it did for me.
Peace…
I’ve been hit with this as well and disabling the “Support” option resolved the internal server errors I’ve been receiving.
This thread has been very helpful!
Peace…
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Embed PDF] width does not seem to workWhich version of WordPress are you using? Also, are you specifying a height as well, or just the width?
Changing the “width” parameter in the embed tag works for me in WordPress 3.5.1.
Peace…
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [W3 Total Cache] FTP credentials don't allow to copy to file ( others)Ok, what are the permission settings when you look at them? Are they 755 or 644 or something else?
Thanks!
Peace…
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [jQuery Lightbox] [Plugin: jQuery Lightbox] doesn't workIn order to get the lightbox effect to work, you have to add:
rel="lightbox"to the anchor element which refers to the larger image.
Peace…
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [jQuery Lightbox] jQuery Lightbox does not work on WordPress 3.5.1The plugin works for me on your site. I’m using Mozilla Firefox 21.
Peace…
I submitted the bug report from within the plugin, itself. There’s a “Support” link I used to report the issue. I’m confident the plugin author is aware of this specific issue because Mr Townes responded to my bug report via e-mail and asked for more information. 🙂
I don’t know if Mr Townes did any investigation into the issue since I told him the upgrade to W3TC 0.9.2.11 addressed the issue but at least her responded to my bug report.
So, if you haven’t filed a bug report yet, you might want to consider doing so. Or, maybe he’ll see this thread and take another look at the bug report I filed.
Peace…
I encountered the same problem with version 0.9.2.10 but upgrading to version 0.9.2.11 resolved the issue for me. I’m thinking it searches the htaccess file for “W3TC Page Cache” and finds a hit on “W3TC Page Cache core” and generates the message. I’m not sure why it’s no longer happening for me.
I did submit a bug report on this so the author is aware of this issue.
Peace…
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [W3 Total Cache] w3 Total Cache Abandoned?No, it hasn’t been abandoned but the author is just a busy guy. 🙂
Some of my questions go unanswered as well, so you’re not alone.
Peace…
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [W3 Total Cache] FTP credentials don't allow to copy to file ( others)Can you login to your site using your FTP client and look at the permissions set on the W3 Total Cache installation directories?
Peace…