Forum Replies Created

Viewing 14 replies - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • Forum: Plugins
    In reply to: Adding an attachment

    The options page throws multiple errors of files and functions not found under 2.5.1. Directories for plugins and icons were found incorrectly and had “attachmentmanager” listed twice. Editing had no effect. No instructions exist in the plugin for actually attaching a file. No idea what an attached file is supposed to look like once attached. No option exists to configure where attachments are stored in the filesystem.

    24fc

    (@24fc)

    Here’s my suggestion: use google analytics instead. Don’t feel like a dummy. This plugin and its current installation design are not ready for prime-time. I can’t make mine work either and I am a software engineer. LOL!

    I think at some point when I upgraded I received akismet and opened a wordpress.com account. I don’t remember doing that to get the API key, but I don’t know the name of the account. It is a mystery to me. There was an API key already plugged into the field for it. I used it in the stats plugin config, and I received the same error message.

    I tried making a new account. I used it for akismet, but I got the same error in stats.

    I gave up and kept google analytics. At least this way I don’t lose my archived stats and it is under the same account as my gmail, so I won’t get confused or locked out.

    This is a great idea – but the API key from an account on a remote site (wordpress.com) for self-hosted people is a PITA, and the instructions need a little work to get things unstuck if you are locked out of your stats for some bizarre reason.

    Like all things wordpress – eventually this will get squared away with better design or better instructions to work with the current design, and it will be a good plugin.

    I suggest you hold off for now.

    Thread Starter 24fc

    (@24fc)

    To follow up, I changed hosts and the problem was eliminated. The timer at the new host shows only .2 sec page generation times in most cases.

    There are a few features in WordPress I would like to see.

    This is definitely one.

    Currently I have removed all references to all feeds from my site and the files that generate them because I have subscriber only podcasts that I hide using “hide this.”

    The feeds were sending out the podcasts to everyone around my login requirement however, defeating the entire purpose for having them – to bring people in to my site directly and cause them to subscribe to it.

    A great add-on feature would be:

    1. The ability to turn on and off feeds by type in the admin panel

    2. The ability to limit by category what goes out through the feeds

    3. The ability to hide post by post from the feeds and from non-subscribers

    4. The ability to hide content within a post from the feeds and from non-subscribers.

    There have been plugins for this, but they are all deprecated or fail to cover the RSS feeds effectively.

    Thread Starter 24fc

    (@24fc)

    Thanks. I took a look at every plugin in the plugins database, and I don’t see any that provide this sort of functionality.

    It would be very cool in a future version of wordpress to see more support for community-building around a blog with more admin power over user administration and more abilities for the users to contact one another and follow one another’s writings.

    To me, a blog is superior to a forum. A forum allows any chuckle-head to write nonsense, to which everyone responds. You get a lot of bad writing that way – with only a few gems here and there.

    I much prefer to read, and to host, a blog where the author shares his thoughts, and the others are free to remark on those thoughts but not initiate the original articles. That way it becomes a base of solid content.

    Thank you wpdiva for looking around for me. I appreciate the help.

    WordPress is an amazing tool – especially when you consider the price. I have enjoyed tweaking and playing with it immensely.

    I agree with you. I hate it.

    I have to say that I think that XHTML validation is probably the dumbest idea I have ever seen in my life where the web is concerned. The definition of XHTML should be widened to make it flexible enough to allow someone who is uninterested in it and not likely to care about it much to use it without violating it.

    All of this blogging software is in the hands of people who do not know XHMTL. They might know scant HTML. They put HTML in their blogs – such as image tags – and don’t self-close the tag. Viola! Validation error.

    And yet it displays fine in a browser.

    The blogging software should not be trying to “fix” this sort of thing. It should instead be allowing it, and the W3C should get off their high-horses and stop trying to deprecate things that millions of people are trained in and want to use.

    The current practice of trying to develop what is essentially language by publishing updated versions and then attempting to require that everyone use it is as doomed to failure as is attempts by schools to get children to stop saying “ain’t.”

    Now that I am done with that rant, I also agree that WordPress should display all tags – the RAW CODE in the post content. It should not be hiding it from me so that I cannot edit it, and it should not be adding to it or changing it to make it validate, because this causes it to not validate, and prevents someone who does not know XHTML very well from even seeing what the problem is so they can fix it when the code that won’t validate is inside the post_content of wp_posts.

    Thread Starter 24fc

    (@24fc)

    I contacted the hosting company again, and this time I pointed out that the admin pages – all of them with the timer on the bottom, were reporting 30 second plus generation times. I’m now getting in the 1 to 3 second per page rage and the site loads fairly rapidly.

    I imagine that something was wrong with the server, some application was choking, or there was someone operating without a proper partition to protect my site from theirs (shared hosting).

    I appreciate the answers. The timer at the bottom of the admin pages was a great idea. It proved that it was not network connectivity.

    Thread Starter 24fc

    (@24fc)

    WARNING: the downgrader didn’t work. I had to restore from a previous backup. The downgrader made it through half my tables and then bombed out with an error.

    Thread Starter 24fc

    (@24fc)

    I am back up and running on 1.5.2. After having used WP 2.0 for 9 days, 1.5.2 is like a slick, speedy, well-oiled machine that just works. My Extended Live Archives appear properly, my site feels solid, there is no mystery cache, I can use permalinks, and I can get back to what I have a blog for in the first place: writing.

    I want to thank all of you for helping. While I am critical of WP 2.0 and do not like it, I love WP 1.5.2, and I am very thankful for the hard work and bug smushing that must have gone on to produce it.

    Hopefully WP 2.5.2 will rock.

    Thread Starter 24fc

    (@24fc)

    Thank you, alphaoide. You are the best!

    Good luck with that. I turned on bad behavior and was immediately blocked from my own site. Keep in mind that because Bad Behavior requires an ACCEPT: to function for any visitor that millions of people will not be able to reach your blog – there are several major ISPs that block that function completely. I had to go in through FTP and delete bad behavior to get back into my own blog. I checked the logs to see why it blocked me, and that’s how I found out that it wasn’t anything I was doing. The fact that the readme file that comes with it acknowledges that ordinary people will be blocked in droves if they use any sort of powerful firewall tells me that it is next to useless to install this.

    Your spam will go way down, and so will your visits.

    You don’t want to do that. The permalinks you are already using are much better for getting ranked higher in a search engine. Search engines use the titles of pages and the urls partially to determine rankings using keywords, so havinga long, descriptive url is actually superior to a short, more easily managed and typed url.

    The wordpress.org web site has been flaking out now pretty consistently for a week or so. 404’s everywhere, then reloading the page comes in. This was perhaps the worst site migration I have ever seen, and the worst possible timing for doing it – right at the moment of a big release.

    Next time, migrate the web site after the release has soaked for a month – not right as you are ramping up to a release.

    I hope you can, because I too think it is useless bloat. I prefer to keep a separate window handy and just refresh my view there when I feel like it.

    I’d also like the ability to disable some of the useless feeds that go into the admin dashboard. Three messages over the last two weeks were just wishing some girls happy birthday. That’s bandwidth I don’t need to waste.

Viewing 14 replies - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)