Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 replies - 61 through 75 (of 390 total)
  • That might be a truer statement than you know. If you’re currently young (say early twenties or less), there’s a fair chance that by the time you reach 60, medical technology will have extended lifetimes by up to 100%. By the time you reach 100 (and still hale and hearty), that will be extended by another 100 years. Finally, when you’re around 160 or so, computer technology will have caught up and you’ll have the option of copying yourself to an electronic form – just in case the age-reduction treatments fail 🙂 And if they do fail and you wake up dead instead of 25, just wait another 100 years for them to be able to grow you a stub body cloned from your original.

    So if you think about it, 18446744073709551615 posts becomes more possible with each passing year.

    340282366920938463463374607431768211456 would just be the physical limit based on the processor’s type handling. If the WP code limits it to 20 bits (as opposed to 32 bits), then 18446744073709551615 *is* the maximum number of posts in a single WordPress blog.

    jdingman, I do still develop for IE – but it saves a LOT of time to develop standards-compliant code first and then get IE to work with it. IE’s bugs are (mostly) well docuemented at various locations, and if you actually understand CSS and XHTML (as opposed to your only experience being the …For Dummies book), it’s simple enough to work that way. It also let’s you bypass browser-sniffing, which is becoming more and more frowned upon – sites should just work, whether I’ve got a blank or modified referrer field, javascript disabled, etc.

    I can’t speak for the Edit Theme page not working in IE – I agree, though, it should “just work.”

    If you really want bullets in your Kubrick sidebar (which, IMHO, looks dumb), find the CSS rule for the UL and/or LI tags, and remove the line that says display-type:none;. No guarantees that the spacing will be perfect afterwards though, you might need to mess with the margins and width too.

    Ditto – I’ve really only had 1 person end up with a non-IE compatible theme, which was easily fixed.

    I too use Firefox for everything except the odd, moronic news site that requires IE to play Quicktime files (wtf?) and watching the Live8 feeds from AOL (ActiveX control, the barstids).

    Statistically, between the 25 WP blogs I host, the highest percentage for IE is only about 65%. On the tech-oriented blogs, it’s more like 20%. On my root page, IE has about 70%.

    In other words, as a developer, I don’t feel it necessary to develop for IE anymore. I develop for Mozilla/Firefox, and then hack as necessary to get the design working in the more broken/less compliant browsers. It turns out that most people can be persuaded into giving up on IE once they actually try Firefox or Opera 🙂

    Go figure 🙂

    if you’re running your own server, check the php.ini file and make sure the SMTP settings are valid. on Windows, if the SMTP server is on the same maching as the web server, the SMTP address has to be localhost or it won’t work (found this out the hard way).

    Unless you’ve created a new user for yourself, the login name will be “admin” regardless of what you select in the Options page.

    Forum: Plugins
    In reply to: WP-shortstat – Borked

    Interestingly, our AWStats stopped being able to update his site stats as of about 10pm last night. Apache is still logging 4 hits per second (average), but the stats update wasn’t seeing anything new…

    Forum: Fixing WordPress
    In reply to: WP Under Load
    Thread Starter rustindy

    (@rustindy)

    Just edited with the stats as of 1 minute ago – we only compile them every 24 hours normally, so the stats missed most of the bump. It’s been 200,000 hits in the past 24 hours! Also edited the IIS site for comparison – fortunately, there is one other site with a comparable load (during weekdays, at least) on the server. This only works out to about 2 or 3 hits per second, which is why I think the 60% server load is a little high…

    Just remember that forcing the site to be 1024 pixels wide will cause a horizontal scrollbar to appear for maybe 90% of the people who go to look at your site.

    So many people don’t know what they’re talking about….

    If you use IIS to host your WordPress blog, you will probably have trouble with permalinks unless you purchase 3rd party software. And even then, you’ll likely need to update the rewrite rules manually, which can be annoying. I think the index.php/ permalink trick works with IIS, but I’m not sure.

    If you use Apache to host your WordPress blog (on Windows), permalinks (mod_rewrite) works just fine.

    I host around 25 WP blogs on Apache 2 with PHP 5 using MySQL 4.1 on a Windows 2000 Server – never had any problems with it (aside from a brief ubergoof regarding spam blacklisting).

    Either remove the xmlrpc.php file if you have access to it, or send an email to your ISP informing them that a serious (and potentially severe) security problem has been identified and a patch is available.

    Of note, this security issue is now public, and worms have been seen in the wild. If you haven’t updated to 1.5.1.3 yet, do it before you go to bed tonite.

    WordPress works fine on Windows servers. It’s written in PHP which is cross-platform, runs under Apache which is cross-platform, and uses MySQL which is cross-platform. Heck, it’ll even work under IIS if you don’t have Apache.

    There are, however, a couple of plugins that don’t work in Windows (or at least didn’t used to) since they use PHP functions that are only available in Linux. These are usually pretty easy to fix though, so let us know if you come across one.

    Forum: Installing WordPress
    In reply to: Screen Size

    There are two solutions.

    First, code your template such that viewers are free to resize the font as they see fit. In other words, don’t specify font sizes in pixels. Ever.

    Second, offer two (or more) stylesheets and use a style-switcher to allow users to choose whether they would like the “normal” version or the “large-fonts” version.

    The third solution is just to use a bigger base font size. There are so many sites out there using “10px” (or less) as their base font size and it sucks big-time.

    Forum: Fixing WordPress
    In reply to: PHP 4 or PHP 5 ?

    Personally, I choose PHP5 for a couple of reasons.

    First, it’s the newest version of PHP, and while there is some breakage with older PHP scripts and some more recent large projects (I’m looking at you, Mambo), for the most part it is backwards compatible with PHP4.

    Second, from a programming perspective, it is much more powerful than PHP4.

    Third, at least on my server, PHP5 does seem to respond slightly faster with database-based applications than PHP4. I don’t know if this is due to changes in PHP itself or changes to the database plugins, but it’s measurable on my server.

    Of course, your mileage may vary.

    Yup, was on purpose and seems to be displaying now. Still loaded with validation errors though. Rohitkumar, check http://validator.w3.org/ and (friendly suggestion) get rid of them errors 🙂

Viewing 15 replies - 61 through 75 (of 390 total)