Masum

Thank you for this detailed report — you’ve found a real bug, and your description helped us locate it. The bulk scanner used a looser matching rule (bare attachment IDs in metadata) than the per-file detail view, which caused exactly the contradiction you saw: false “In Use” in the overview while details correctly showed 0 locations. We’re unifying both views onto one detection engine and adding a “why is this marked used” indicator so results are verifiable. Fix is targeted for v1.0.2 within [timeframe]. If you’re willing, I’d be glad to have you verify the fix — and either way, thank you for testing thoroughly before deleting anything, which is precisely how the plugin is meant to be used.