wanderingexplorer
Forum Replies Created
-
UPDATE AND SOLUTION:
Managed to get a solution on the Rank Math support system. Posting the link here in case it helps anyone having the same issue and can’t find a solution here:
https://support.rankmath.com/ticket/woocommerce-breadcrumb-bug/
Thank you
See my review here and a reply from @hristo-sg
He has confirmed that they will now provide support for Memcached in WPMS starting from the next major update ;-).
@hristo-sg Would still be nice to have a global setting though so we can allow all sub sites to be able to see Supercacher setting or hide Supercacher settings from all sub sites.
@hristo-sg much appreciated for letting me know. Looking forward to the update and will be looking to test it on a WPMS shortly after its release.
Hope you don’t mind me jumping in here again, but I too would like the settings to be global. So either give all subsites control of SG Optimizer settings, or remove control from all of them, rather than on an individual basis. In almost all cases we would only want to allow network admins to be able to set this up and determine appropriate settings for the network and subsites.
@ivanatanasov I don’t understand the issue regarding the memory pool? I would imagine that most Multisite owners would have a Cloud hosting, or dedicated plan. While those who are on one of the shared hosting plans are likely to have only a few subsites on their network.
@hristo-sg sorry to tag, but could you please provided some insight here? Will Memcache become available for Multisite, in a future version of SG Optimizer? This is somewhat a deciding factor as to whether to stick with my current host for my multisite installations or move them to SiteGround. Thank you.
Hi @hristo-sg
Sorry but really wandering about this? Any idea if you will support memcached for multisite anytime soon?
Thanks.
Exactly what I am after as well. Any idea if memcached will be available for Multisite in the next update of SG Optimizer?
If so I will also be looking to move my multisites to SiteGround.
Thanks.
Forum: Reviews
In reply to: [Gutenberg] This editor is ten steps backwards. Forgets the majority userbaseI couldn’t agree more. I have done the same and tried to get a small random sample of my own user base to try it out. People who are fairly computer literate and some that are a bit less so.
The result… everyone says the same thing. “Too complicated”. “Can’t find [blah blah] (settings and tools)”. “Can’t we just stick with the current editor?”, “This is a nightmare!”, “Step backwards”, “I need to take a degree to learn how to use this”.
Very disappointed with the WP management team to let it get this far without listening to the community! It’s a nice idea, but not fit for purpose. Please don’t add this to core!!