Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 replies - 46 through 60 (of 168 total)
  • pixelyzed

    (@pixelyzed)

    Hi Brandon,

    Just to be clear, we’re not talking about replacing the mailing list’s provider processing, just adding one thing that would probably help greatly reduce bogus signups even before the data reaches the service provider when it’s too late in the form submission process to use a honeypot or reCaptcha.

    The honeypot solution is the easiest to implement and least intrusive to legit site visitors and should of course be optional but I do believe it would greatly help.

    Thanks for considering it!

    pixelyzed

    (@pixelyzed)

    We’re dealing with a lot of signup spam via the eNews Extended widget too. On our sites where we use Ninja Forms or Formidable Pro for these signup forms, it’s not a problem as both these plugins add honeypot fields automatically (and have (re)Captcha fields as well if the problem is more severe).

    I think adding at least a hidden honeypot field and necessary validation would really help the eNews Extended plugin as, for now, I need to replace it on at least 4 client sites and my own personal one which are all being hammered by bogus subscriptions and the numerous returned emails this entails as well as the server being blocked by some ISPs in one case.

    This really is becoming a huge time consuming issue as I’ve seen the number of these bogus signups go up very significantly in the last few weeks and it’s just getting worse every day.

    Thanks!

    • This reply was modified 9 years ago by pixelyzed.

    Hi there!

    Sorry to revive this thread but I have a similar request but the explanation page you linked to describes how to add fields with include/exclude criteria and not showing theme.

    I need to use fields for front-end filtering but not display them in the listing. But these fields have no include/exclude criteria as we want to display all the user records wheter there’s data in those fields or not and whatever the data may be. The only include criteria we have is a specific role the users must be in to appear in the listing and this value is not displayed or filtered in the front end as it’s not pertinent to site visitors.

    For the moment I’m using CSS to hide the columns I don’t want to display but I was wondering if there is another way. We’re using amr Users 4.3 and amr Users Plus 3.0.

    Thanks!

    Same here. Not working for me either with latest version of plugin.

    Thread Starter pixelyzed

    (@pixelyzed)

    Having the same exact issue on a client site as well. 404 on every front end page and all settings in sub site showing the root site settings. Deactivating your plugin fixes the issue immediately.

    Spent almost 2 hours troubleshooting this on a Sunday and my client installed that plugin, not me. Your QA processes should really be improved…

    Thread Starter pixelyzed

    (@pixelyzed)

    Forgot to mark this as resolved. Thanks again! 🙂

    Thread Starter pixelyzed

    (@pixelyzed)

    @niknetniko Understood! 🙂 As I said, I’m just sure it’s something some users will request but as it is, the feature now works perfectly again for our users’ needs.

    Thank you very much!

    Thread Starter pixelyzed

    (@pixelyzed)

    Hi Niko!

    Wow! That was fast! And it works exactly as expected. With the setting off (which it seems to be by default which is good), things work exactly as before in terms of size and ratio but with the nicer UI and grid within the thumbnail rectangle. That’s fantastic!

    Turning the setting on also works great and will indeed be awesome for those wanting a masonry type layout.

    This solves that issue for us. Thank you so much!

    As a guy with experience in UX, the other thing I’m sure some people will request is to be able to toggle between the old “constrained” behavior that we need and the new one but individually for each image. The “Different sizes” setting would control default behavior but I’m sure some poeple will want individual override.

    But as far as I’m concerned, for my artist users, this new version works perfectly and, in our case, those users do not have access to the main settings anyway so they can’t break things just like it’s always been before.

    Thank you, thank you! 🙂 Will check the Bitbucket issue next.

    Thread Starter pixelyzed

    (@pixelyzed)

    Hi again Niko,

    Just created an issue on BitBucket. If you need access to the dev site, please write me an email at: stephane (at) pixelyzed (dot) com and I will give you my login details.

    Thanks again for your excellent support!

    Thread Starter pixelyzed

    (@pixelyzed)

    Hi there!

    Thanks for the quick response. Much appreciated. I will file an issue at Bitbucket.

    As for the second issue, yes it’s possible to change the thumbnail from the bulk actions but the size is just part of the thing. These are artists creating image galleries of paintings of all different sizes and formats. Further, the bulk actions simply centers the thumbnail while what they’ve always been able to do with NextGen 1.9.13 and before and NextCellent until 1.9.30 is draw their own thumbnail anywhere in the image (which is rarely if ever dead center) and save it like that and the size set in settings and the personalized crop they made (using the predefined format ratio) would be honored and displayed correctly on the front en as in the 3 correct galeries I linked to before. Photographers would need the same thing and, to me, that is the primary use case.

    I understand that the new behavior would be useful to many I’m sure, but respecting the size and ratio in settings when creatting a personalized crop remains in my opinion the main use case and what most people will expect to be able to do to do. Removing that behavior makes NextCellent much less useful to many people IMO. It makes it unusable as it is for this site and the several other artists sites I’ve used NextGen 1.9.x/NextCellent on.

    Did I describe the use case more clearly?

    Thanks!

    Hello Yorman,

    I was having the same issue and installed the dev version you linked to. That fixed it for me 🙂

    Thank you!!

    Thread Starter pixelyzed

    (@pixelyzed)

    Hi again!

    Found it works in functions.php.

    I’ve searched but found no way to remove a specific item?

    Thread Starter pixelyzed

    (@pixelyzed)

    Hi John,

    I’m wondering if you have code examples somewhere for adding an item in the trail at either the end or before a specific item depending on what the item is?

    Also, can the bcn_after_fill hook be used in the theme’s functions.php or a functionality plugin (with appropriate confitionals to only taget the trail on certain posts/pages/CPTs).

    Thanks!

    Thread Starter pixelyzed

    (@pixelyzed)

    Just tested 5.2.80 and it actually breaks all the CPT breadcrumbs. The one with my code above looses the root page and goes directely Home > My Custom Item.

    I have other CPTs that are “under” regular pages. With the 5.2.2 version, as long as I have the correct root page selected, the breadcrumb is correct wether I have the “Show the breadcrumb for the <cpt name> post type archives in the breadcrumb trail” checked or not. I guess that is not logical and is one thing you are fixing.

    In 5.2.80, with the same root page setting and the “Show the breadcrumb for the <cpt name> post type archives in the breadcrumb trail” unchecked, the post type archive link doesn’t show and I have “Home > Root Page” which makes sense. But if I select it, the CPT archive link is displayed twice and both are identical (text and link) which is definitely not desirable behavior:

    Home > Root Page > CPT Archive > CPT Archive

    In the case of my code above, on the archives affected by that code, if I have the “Show the breadcrumb for the <cpt name> post type archives in the breadcrumb trail” setting unchecked, I get “Home > My custom item”. Notice the Root Page is not there. If I have it checked, I have the same trail I was trying to change before PLUS my custom item:

    Home > Root Page > CPT Archive > My Custom Item

    (remembering that Root Page and CPT Archive have the same name which will be confusing to users).

    What I want is:

    Home > Root Page > My Custom Item

    So, at this point, 5.2.80 breaks both my code and the “normal” CPT archive behavior.

    Thanks!

Viewing 15 replies - 46 through 60 (of 168 total)