I made the changes – retrospectively has not have any effect.
Maybe in the next post..
It is midnight in Europe, so now I say good-day to you.
And many thanks for your help and patience!
Telling the truth – I have no idea…
I just realized that the hover might mean “background”. Sorry, I am a hopeless amateur.
Please, tell me, in the link/hover color relation which should I change to effect the front-end: the active link or the content link…?
Dear André!
I hope you are reading this message after a good cup of coffee. I am afraid, you might need a second cup at the end of it… The dumbest problem is coming. The tech-talk is klingon to me, so I made an illustration to explain it.
a) the draft version – “Osteria Fernanda” appears in a slightly different color
b) the published version – here the letters are black, but you will get to the website of the restaurant, if you click on
c) after once you clicked on, it got the customized color
Why is not get the customized color in the published version at first?
Kind regards,
C
Oh, sorry!
Have a good night sleep.
I will catch up tomorrow.
C
Dear André,
I have a new problem, still with the image post format. Would you let me know how to fix it?
All link words appear on the editing screen in the pre-set color. However, when I check the site page, the keywords are black, but the linking is OK. I would like to put visible – colored – link words on the page too.
Best wishes,
C
Thanks a lot!
It was indeed the permalinks setting. Since it is back to default, everything is OK with the “Image Post format”.
C.
