Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 replies - 256 through 270 (of 417 total)
  • trevorturk said:
    there’s something about this in the codex. feel free to update it:
    http://codex.wordpress.org/Pages#Using_a_Page_as_the_Front_Page

    Obviously someone did “feel free to update it” since most of this information is missing . . .

    Thread Starter kickass

    (@kickass)

    Thank you, Skippy. That’s the page I was frantically searching for in that dang codex . . .

    Thread Starter kickass

    (@kickass)

    Is there anyone who at least knows if this CAN be done?

    Core is very convoluted and generates bunch of markup around this, some of which seems related to the parent/child thing. The pages I’m creating have no “children” and never will, so why is oriecat’s otherwise workable solution trying to insert a nested list where one doesn’t belong? Please, is there another way to do this?

    Thread Starter kickass

    (@kickass)

    This tag, though it’s closer than what I was using, and didn’t throw errors, generated extra html markup- a whole extra list within my list, which threw everything out of alignment, and wanks validation.

    Source code from my original tag:

    <ul class="pagelist">
    <li class="page_item"><a href="http://kickasswebdesign.com/wptest/?page_id=17" title="Test Page Five">Test Page Five</a></li>
    <li class="page_item"><a href="http://kickasswebdesign.com/wptest/?page_id=16" title="Test Page Four">Test Page Four</a></li>
    <li class="page_item"><a href="http://kickasswebdesign.com/wptest/?page_id=15" title="Test Page Three">Test Page Three</a></li>
    <li class="page_item"><a href="http://kickasswebdesign.com/wptest/?page_id=14" title="Test Page Two">Test Page Two</a></li>
    <li class="page_item"><a href="http://kickasswebdesign.com/wptest/?page_id=5" title="This is Test Page One">This is Test Page One</a></li>
    </ul>

    Source code from oriecat tag:

    <ul class="pagelist">
    <li class="pagenav"> <ul><li class="page_item"><a href="http://kickasswebdesign.com/wptest/?page_id=5" title="This is Test Page One">This is Test Page One</a></li>
    <li class="page_item"><a href="http://kickasswebdesign.com/wptest/?page_id=14" title="Test Page Two">Test Page Two</a></li>
    <li class="page_item"><a href="http://kickasswebdesign.com/wptest/?page_id=15" title="Test Page Three">Test Page Three</a></li>
    <li class="page_item"><a href="http://kickasswebdesign.com/wptest/?page_id=16" title="Test Page Four">Test Page Four</a></li>
    <li class="page_item"><a href="http://kickasswebdesign.com/wptest/?page_id=17" title="Test Page Five">Test Page Five</a></li>
    </ul></li>
    </ul>

    I really need that ul class=”pagelist” to hang style on, so I can’t just leave my ul markup out of it. Thanks oriecat for at least getting me closer- but can anyone else see a better way?

    oh, and don’t forget to use display: inline; on the floats, so IE doesn’t double any margins, which would also cause this.

    IE always needs a bit more room. Narrow your columns (and their wrapper) a bit. Keep narrowing bit by bit until you get the right behavior.

    FYI, there are a few hosts out there that require you to go in through cpanel (or whatever other access method you have) file manager in order to edit .htaccess.

    Thread Starter kickass

    (@kickass)

    vkaryl- I don’t want complete posts on my archive list pages, I want exerpts– but I also want them paragraphed the way I meant them to be, which is the way it used to work in 1.5. Using 1.5.1.3 it seems that if I want to have my archive pages paragraphed properly and the way I intended then I’m forced to show whole posts instead of exerpts. That, quite frankly, sucks.

    tomhanna- I might be totally wrong, but the way I understood that thread the_exerpt was putting paragraph tags around the whole exerpt and, if there were already paragraphs formed within the exerpt, this would then cause a validation error. Okay, I understand that would cause a problem– BUT that does not seem to be what is happening in 1.5 with excerpts on archive pages (which work properly.) Read down further and you’ll see what I mean. I’m also seeing a reference to the_excerpt_rss as the choice of tags to use inside links since the_excerpt_rss strips out all html tags. Okay, that makes sense, and there is a different tag to use for linking purposes. If people use the_excerpt_rss for this “inside a link” purpose then why can’t paragraphing be made to work in the_excerpt?? That would seem to be the logical breakdown and the logical uses for both.

    Just so we’re all on the same page here, I pulled source on one of my archive pages in the 1.5 version blog and this is the code:
    <div class="entry">
    <p>Kickass-Convergence is up and running, and seems to work well on Win-PC browsers. Please let me know of any problems or issues, especially in Mac Browsers (yes, IEMac, if you can!)</p>

    <p>If you’re here to browser check Kickass-Convergence for me, you’ll find it on my theme-switcher, which lurks towards the bottom of my linklists. […]</p>

    </div>

    The page, is here (Kickass- Convergence on themeswitcher, just so we’re all looking at the same code):
    http://kickasswebdesign.com/wordpress/category/wordpress-stuff/

    I ran it through validation and it’s fine. You can also see, when you look at the code snippet and at source of that page, that no extraneous paragraph tags are being added around the “outside” of the excerpts to cause validation errors, which means that in 1.5 the original the_excerpt worked perfectly well, which is what I’ve been contending all along. But in 1.5.1.3 archive pages it doesn’t.

    If this no-longer-paragraphing thing was a “fix” for something else, well, it broke excerpts for the original intended purpose. And since there’s another and more logical tag to use for the purpose the “fix” seems to have been intended for (if I understand all this mess correctly) . . . Please, give all of us paragraphing back in excerpts!

    I couldn’t access it either.

    Let us know if this works. If it does I’d love to use it, if it doesn’t there are some other scripts I can steer you toward, but they’re a fair bit more complicated than this.

    Josh, you don’t need to relatively or absolutely position anything. Just put the links in a list and float the linklist to the right (which is where I assume you want it) and, if you want to put the list items so they’re somewhat at a diagonal over that black area, just give each li a different class with different padding/margin set. Make sure to set a width on your floated element. You may need to “clear” it by using a br after the floated element. If it needs more clearing than that, check here:

    http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=ClearingSpace

    I did try to view what you are trying to do, but IE seems to be showing something completely different. In IE the header color scheme is gray and the sidebar column is on the left, and in FF the header color scheme is green and the sidebar column is on the right.

    Oh, and I did peek at the source code in the FF version, and there are some problems in the code. I ran it through the validator at w3.org and it’s minor stuff, but it should be straightened out. FF will always work better with clean code.

    I’m sorry if this sounds simplistic, but it needs to be asked. Did you make the new theme active in the admin area?

    Thread Starter kickass

    (@kickass)

    “Why do you think this is a problem in core files?”
    Paragraphing in the_exerpt works in 1.5. It doesn’t work in 1.5.1.3. Same theme. Theme hasn’t changed. Core files have. What evidence do you have that it isn’t in the core? Show me.

    “Or is your complaint that the_excerpt no longer uses paragraph tags. That’s an improvement not a bug IMHO since those paragraph tags cause validation errors in some cases.” What type of validation are you speaking of? I validated 1.5 paragraphed category archive with no problem, both xhtml and css. I’ve also never heard of a properly used paragraph tag causing a validation error ever. As to my “complaint” re paragraphing, if a sentence is defined by the author (any author!) as a paragraph it should be presented that way by WP, whether it’s an exerpt or a full post. It used to work. It doesn’t now. Why would you feel that changing an author’s work is something that is for the better?

    “There are at least two threads I’ve seen recently on the problem caused by having when the_excerpt is placed in a link. It’s useful to have something with an excerpt of text that you can use in situations where the extra formatting isn’t required (or could even cause problems) and the logical place to do that seems to be the_excerpt.” Maybe not so logical . . . maybe another template tag should be created for this specific use, and that only calls maybe the first sentence or the first X words of a post, and that will strip out formatting. Save the_exerpt for its original intended use, and don’t try to overburden it by making it wear too many hats.

    Bottom line is this– Don’t you think the presentation the author expects should be respected? Or do you want to rewrite/reformat all my posts too?

    Were you trying to only place it once on your page? Try putting it outside of the loop.

    fyi, opening a unix file in dreamweavermx/windoze automatically “converts” it, so if you already have dreamweaver you don’t need to download and install another program.

Viewing 15 replies - 256 through 270 (of 417 total)