Scott Reilly
Forum Replies Created
-
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Optin Comment Notifications] Add option to other users' profilesHi @ashmtl,
The setting for getting notifications (as added by this plugin) is a per-user setting. Each user must go into their profile and check “Email me whenever a comment is submitted to the site.” By default this is not checked. Once checked, the plugin will only email a notification to users who have that setting checked.
Even as an administrator, this plugin won’t email you unless you have checked the setting’s checkbox. If you don’t want the emails, then uncheck the setting.
Is it behaving differently for you?
Note: put a checkmark in the checkbox for one user does not affect other users, so your statement “[a]fter this action the plugin start to email comments to the users” should only make sense if you mean after the action (you putting a checkmark in the setting) then you personally (via the email address for your user account) started getting emails.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Text Hover] No Hover TextHi @theprezinjapan,
The Text Hover plugin only attempts to search for terms to hover in post content, excerpts, and widget text.
WordPress does not come with a form editor, so the situation you describe suggests you are entering text into fields created by a plugin. Most likely you’d have to add a few lines of code to add support for output from that plugin. Assuming, of course, that the form plugin has the appropriate filters.
The plugin’s documentation has an example of how to do this (see ‘c2c_text_hover_filters’ filter), but it requires knowing what filter to hook from the form plugin.
Hi @carasmo and @tarranjones,
Sorry for the belated follow-up to this. I greatly appreciate your reports!
The issue was fixed in v1.8 of Hide Broken Shortcodes back in May 2016, though I neglected to follow up here about it until now. The plugin no longer attempts to identify potential shortcodes within HTML attributes, which is what had caused problems with other plugins such as WooCommerce.
Cheers!
Hi @stephenharris,
Sorry for the belated follow-up to this. I greatly appreciate your report!
The issue was fixed in v1.8 of Hide Broken Shortcodes back in May 2016, though I neglected to follow up here about it until now. The plugin no longer attempts to identify potential shortcodes within HTML attributes.
Cheers!
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [HTML Special Characters Helper] LOL post types – it’s time!Hi @mac2net,
I’m glad to hear you’re a longtime user of the plugin! You should be happy to hear that v2.2 of HTML Special Characters Helper now supports all public post types (more specifically, post types that have an admin interface and thus appear in the admin menu).
Since v1.8 (in 2012) the plugin has supported explicitly customizing the supported post types via a filter. Though it required you to add some custom code (for which the readme.txt had an example), you could at least do so without modifying the plugin directly. But you’re right, supporting public custom post types was something the plugin should’ve handled out of the box and now it does.
Cheers!
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Linkify Text] Protect A Word from NOT being linked ?@magicmiles: Ah, I see what you’re asking about now. It’s similar (if not identical) to something that has been previously requested by a few others.
Which of the following most accurately describes the behavior you want:
- Don’t link a term if the link would point to the page currently being viewed. Otherwise, link as normal.
- Provide a mechanism to disable ALL linkifications for a given post or page. (Basically an on/off switch for linkification, with the default being “on”.)
- Provide a mechanism to selectively disable certain terms from get linkified for a given post or page. (Basically everything gets linkified unless a term is explicitly included in a list of exclusions.)
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Linkify Text] Protect A Word from NOT being linked ?Hi @magicmiles,
I’m not sure what you mean. This plugin only links words or phrases that you explicitly specify via its settings. To keep a word from being linked, you’d simply not create a link for it in the plugin.
But I suspect that’s not what you mean. An example might help clarify what you had in mind.
If you want to unlink a word that is already linked by something other than this plugin, then that’s not really something this plugin can address.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Optin Comment Notifications] Add option to other users' profilesHi @swinggraphics:
Thanks for the suggestion! Your example code is no longer available, but I implemented the feature in v1.2 of Optin Comment Notifications, so you shouldn’t need to run a custom version for this functionality any longer.
Cheers!
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Blog Time] Great Plugin! I found a bugHi @surge42,
Thanks for the feedback! The issue you reported was more a shortcoming than a bug since Blog Time knowingly didn’t support custom time format strings for the dynamic clock. I had mentions of it in the documentation since, quite frankly, I knew it would naturally be expected to work. And no one could be blamed for wanting or expect it to work.
However, there is now good news! I’ve just released v3.5 of the plugin which introduces full support for custom time formats for the dynamic clock in the adminbar and the widget, amongst other improvements.
I encourage you to update and give it a try. Let me know how it goes.
Cheers!
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Allow Multiple Accounts] Compatibility with Ultimate MemberHi @jviseur:
I’m about to update the plugin to include the following note:
If your site is using a membership plugin, there’s a high likelihood that this plugin will not allow user accounts to share an email address as advertised. Most membership plugins implement their own user creation and update process that is incompatible with how the plugin works to permit WordPress itself to allow user accounts to share an email address.
I believe Ultimate Member is one such plugin that is incompatible at this time.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Text Replace] Error with empty lines – line 404 in @package C2C_Plugins@jramoscarmenates: Hi,
Thanks for the bug report! The issue has been fixed as of v3.7 of the plugin.
Cheers!
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Loop Post Navigation Links] Only URl@stunomatic: Hi,
That’s a good suggestion for a future set of template tags to add to the plugin.
In the meantime, I recommending using the plugin to get the adjacent post object and then get its URL. Like so:
// Get next post. // Could also use c2c_get_previous_or_loop_post() to get previous post. $post = c2c_get_next_or_loop_post(); // Echo the post's permalink URL. echo get_permalink( $post );This could be condensed to one line if you like:
echo get_permalink( c2c_get_next_or_loop_post() );Forum: Reviews
In reply to: [Obfuscate Email] Well, it sort-of works@hoochalaffa: Hi,
Where are you checking the output? Are you using ‘view source’ to view the raw text output? You can’t use the browser’s developer/inspector tools to examine the elements since encoded characters are converted there.
If you have the “Obfuscate entire e-mail address?” setting checked but the “Replacement for ‘@'” setting blank, the output of your example looks like this:
If “Obfuscate entire e-mail address?” is checked, the output looks like this:
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Obfuscate Email] folder "tests" necessary?@kenpachizaraki : Hi,
The folder isn’t necessary for the plugin to function. It’s the test suite used in development to ensure the plugin operates as expected even after changes are made.
You can delete the folder if you wish, but when you update to a newer version of the plugin it’ll get restored. Leaving the folder in place doesn’t pose any real issues for your site.
In the future I plan to omit the packaging of the test folder from the plugin releases.
Cheers!
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Auto-hyperlink URLs] Thank you for updated version!@neotrope: Hi Chris,
Thanks for the donation! Much appreciated!
I’ve slated your request for the next version of the plugin. Basically it’ll be a new setting that you can enable to prevent URLs without schemes (e.g. ‘http://’ or ‘https://’) from being auto-linked. It’ll be filterable as well.
I’ll follow-up back here and resolve this thread once it has been implemented.
Cheers!