alexleonard

I think I can get around it by directing the user to a thank you page on successful submission, but in this case it’s complicated as the form is loaded as an iframe in some cases, but as a full page view in other cases (which makes redirecting complicated as sometimes it will be in an iframe, and other times it won’t).

Ok, I’ve worked this one out.

I’ve got the following code in my head to prepare the correct itemprop items as per Google+ requirements.

<!-- Add the following three tags inside head -->
	<meta itemprop="name" content="<?php wp_title(); ?>">
	<?php
		$postCustom = get_post_custom($post->ID);
		$yoastMetaDescription = $postCustom['_yoast_wpseo_metadesc'][0];
		if ($yoastMetaDescription) {
			echo '<meta itemprop="description" content="' . $yoastMetaDescription . '">' . "\n";
		}
	?>
	<?php
		if ( has_post_thumbnail($post->ID) ) {
			$featuredThumb = wp_get_attachment_image_src( get_post_thumbnail_id($post->ID), 'standard-list-thumb');
			echo '<meta itemprop="image" content="' . $featuredThumb[0] . '">';
		}
	?>

I’m using ‘standard-list-thumb’ as my image size, but you’ll need to replace it as you see fit.

Right, well I’ve finally found some more time to investigate and I’m going to post my findings here. So I’ve uploaded some new images to the system and, as expected, they work without an issue.

So here’s a working image, newly uploaded:

|   30128 |   28724 | _wp_attachment_metadata | a:6:{s:5:"width";s:4:"1920";s:6:"height";s:4:"1280";s:14:"hwstring_small";s:23:"height='85' width='128'";s:4:"file";s:28:"2012/01/statues-IMG_6277.jpg";s:5:"sizes";a:14:{s:9:"thumbnail";a:3:{s:4:"file";s:28:"statues-IMG_6277-200x133.jpg";s:5:"width";s:3:"200";s:6:"height";s:3:"133";}s:6:"medium";a:3:{s:4:"file";s:28:"statues-IMG_6277-710x473.jpg";s:5:"width";s:3:"710";s:6:"height";s:3:"473";}s:5:"large";a:3:{s:4:"file";s:29:"statues-IMG_6277-1280x853.jpg";s:5:"width";s:4:"1280";s:6:"height";s:3:"853";}s:9:"rss-thumb";a:3:{s:4:"file";s:28:"statues-IMG_6277-400x266.jpg";s:5:"width";s:3:"400";s:6:"height";s:3:"266";}s:19:"standard-list-thumb";a:3:{s:4:"file";s:28:"statues-IMG_6277-160x160.jpg";s:5:"width";s:3:"160";s:6:"height";s:3:"160";}s:15:"home-post-thumb";a:3:{s:4:"file";s:26:"statues-IMG_6277-75x75.jpg";s:5:"width";s:2:"75";s:6:"height";s:2:"75";}s:16:"photo-grid-thumb";a:3:{s:4:"file";s:28:"statues-IMG_6277-230x230.jpg";s:5:"width";s:3:"230";s:6:"height";s:3:"230";}s:19:"wallpaper-1920x1200";a:3:{s:4:"file";s:30:"statues-IMG_6277-1920x1200.jpg";s:5:"width";s:4:"1920";s:6:"height";s:4:"1200";}s:19:"wallpaper-1920x1080";a:3:{s:4:"file";s:30:"statues-IMG_6277-1920x1080.jpg";s:5:"width";s:4:"1920";s:6:"height";s:4:"1080";}s:19:"wallpaper-1680x1050";a:3:{s:4:"file";s:30:"statues-IMG_6277-1680x1050.jpg";s:5:"width";s:4:"1680";s:6:"height";s:4:"1050";}s:18:"wallpaper-1440x900";a:3:{s:4:"file";s:29:"statues-IMG_6277-1440x900.jpg";s:5:"width";s:4:"1440";s:6:"height";s:3:"900";}s:18:"wallpaper-1366x768";a:3:{s:4:"file";s:29:"statues-IMG_6277-1368x768.jpg";s:5:"width";s:4:"1368";s:6:"height";s:3:"768";}s:19:"wallpaper-1280x1024";a:3:{s:4:"file";s:30:"statues-IMG_6277-1280x1024.jpg";s:5:"width";s:4:"1280";s:6:"height";s:4:"1024";}s:18:"wallpaper-1280x800";a:3:{s:4:"file";s:29:"statues-IMG_6277-1280x800.jpg";s:5:"width";s:4:"1280";s:6:"height";s:3:"800";}}s:10:"image_meta";a:10:{s:8:"aperture";s:3:"1.4";s:6:"credit";s:12:"Alex Leonard";s:6:"camera";s:14:"Canon EOS 550D";s:7:"caption";s:86:"A statue over the doorway of one of the churches in Ballycastle. Well lit up at night.";s:17:"created_timestamp";s:10:"1325525994";s:9:"copyright";s:0:"";s:12:"focal_length";s:2:"50";s:3:"iso";s:3:"400";s:13:"shutter_speed";s:5:"0.005";s:5:"title";s:7:"Statues";}} |
|   30127 |   28724 | _wp_attached_file       | 2012/01/statues-IMG_6277.jpg

and here’s a broken image.

|    4799 |   25410 | _wp_attachment_metadata | a:6:{s:5:"width";s:3:"480";s:6:"height";s:3:"391";s:14:"hwstring_small";s:23:"height='96' width='117'";s:4:"file";s:32:"2011/06/google-vs-rapportive.jpg";s:5:"sizes";a:14:{s:9:"thumbnail";a:5:{s:4:"file";s:32:"google-vs-rapportive-200x162.jpg";s:5:"width";s:3:"200";s:6:"height";s:3:"162";s:4:"path";s:40:"2011/06/google-vs-rapportive-200x162.jpg";s:3:"url";s:102:"http://alex.leonard.ie/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/google-vs-rapportive-200x162.jpg";}s:6:"medium";s:0:"";s:5:"large";s:0:"";s:9:"rss-thumb";a:3:{s:4:"file";s:32:"google-vs-rapportive-400x325.jpg";s:5:"width";s:3:"400";s:6:"height";s:3:"325";}s:19:"standard-list-thumb";a:5:{s:4:"file";s:32:"google-vs-rapportive-160x160.jpg";s:5:"width";s:3:"160";s:6:"height";s:3:"160";s:4:"path";s:40:"2011/06/google-vs-rapportive-160x160.jpg";s:3:"url";s:102:"http://alex.leonard.ie/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/google-vs-rapportive-160x160.jpg";}s:15:"home-post-thumb";a:5:{s:4:"file";s:30:"google-vs-rapportive-75x75.jpg";s:5:"width";s:2:"75";s:6:"height";s:2:"75";s:4:"path";s:38:"2011/06/google-vs-rapportive-75x75.jpg";s:3:"url";s:100:"http://alex.leonard.ie/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/google-vs-rapportive-75x75.jpg";}s:16:"photo-grid-thumb";a:5:{s:4:"file";s:32:"google-vs-rapportive-230x230.jpg";s:5:"width";s:3:"230";s:6:"height";s:3:"230";s:4:"path";s:40:"2011/06/google-vs-rapportive-230x230.jpg";s:3:"url";s:102:"http://alex.leonard.ie/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/google-vs-rapportive-230x230.jpg";}s:19:"wallpaper-1920x1200";s:0:"";s:19:"wallpaper-1920x1080";s:0:"";s:19:"wallpaper-1680x1050";s:0:"";s:18:"wallpaper-1440x900";s:0:"";s:18:"wallpaper-1366x768";s:0:"";s:19:"wallpaper-1280x1024";s:0:"";s:18:"wallpaper-1280x800";s:0:"";}s:10:"image_meta";a:10:{s:8:"aperture";s:1:"0";s:6:"credit";s:12:"Alex Leonard";s:6:"camera";s:0:"";s:7:"caption";s:0:"";s:17:"created_timestamp";s:10:"1309363357";s:9:"copyright";s:0:"";s:12:"focal_length";s:1:"0";s:3:"iso";s:1:"0";s:13:"shutter_speed";s:1:"0";s:5:"title";s:0:"";}} |
|    4798 |   25410 | _wp_attached_file       | 2011/06/google-vs-rapportive.jpg

I’m finding it next to impossible to work out what’s going on with this serialised data. They look pretty similar to me, however the one thing I’ve noticed that is in the broken image is mention of “path”. The working image doesn’t mention “path” at all in its serialised data.

Anyone any thoughts? I don’t think I can just go deleting the path part of the _wp_attachment_metadata, and I’m not even sure how I’d go about programatically doing that.

I do find it funny that our own security measure of disabling directory listing in apache gets us marked as potentially harbouring malware. I’d be far more suspicious of the security of a host that allows directory listing to folders without an index file.

However I also appreciate that you need to take these things seriously at your end. Cheers!

Hi Swanson Photos,

I have no idea how it thinks that. The folder it has flagged is:
devel.pixelapes.com/mary-davis/

This folder contains a load of pdf files and zips with pdf files in them.

A4_Posters.zip MD-A5-Leaflet-110911-outlined-text.zip MD_A5_Leaflet_290911_Irish_large.zip MD_files_for_printer.zip MD-Panels-080911-outlined-text.pdf
MD-A5-Leaflet-110911-outlined-text.pdf MD_A5_Leaflet_290911_Irish_large.pdf MD_A5_Leaflet_290911_Irish.pdf MD_Flag.pdf MD_Posters_21x48_FA_080911_Irish_A4.pdf

I’ve deleted this folder anyway and any other files and zips in the root just in case.

sucuri.net is still saying the root folder has malware, but perhaps it hasn’t rescanned, but I can only assure you that’s wrong.

Anyway, I’m only linking to devel.pixelapes.com/alex.leonard.ie which is verified clean:

http://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/http://devel.pixelapes.com/alex.leonard.ie/

I hope that clears everything up. Obviously I take any malware threat as extremely important. This is our own server and is regularly scanned for a huge variety of insecurities. I hope that reassures you.

Do you think you have any idea what might be wrong?