agharbeia
Forum Replies Created
-
Forum: Installing WordPress
In reply to: permalink not identified correctly (not fully decoded)Yes, it works, Otto.
Thank you.Forum: Installing WordPress
In reply to: permalink not identified correctly (not fully decoded)Thank you again, Otto. I have reported it http://trac.wordpress.org/ticket/4499
For now I guess I will have to avoid publishing at the zero hour.
Forum: Installing WordPress
In reply to: permalink not identified correctly (not fully decoded)I’d like to report this as a bug in 2.2.
Where should I do this?Forum: Installing WordPress
In reply to: permalink not identified correctly (not fully decoded)Otto, your sharp note is the answer. It is the zero hour!
This post: http://zamakan.gharbeia.org/2006/11/15/002309 which resolved perfectly well before I had upgraded to WP 2.2, now does not 🙁
I’m sure it worked before because:
1. I always visit all my posts more than once using the normal navigation interface available to readers, just to check things.2. It has comments. Something that is now impossible because there’s no way to reach the post-specific page.
Do you think it is a bug in 2.2? Something missed in the refactoring?
Forum: Installing WordPress
In reply to: permalink not identified correctly (not fully decoded)Otto, thank you for taking time to look into this.
Regarding your question about the time having hours other than zero, I guess that the answer should be yes, since I have all sorts of time combinations in my archive, and let me clarify that I have been using this permalink structure since I started using WP. Not that I am just trying it now.
This is a good note, however, since both subject posts have their hour as zero, something I haven’t paid attention to when I was debugging.
The third to last post, which doesn’t have hours set to zero works perfectly: http://zamakan.gharbeia.org/2007/05/01/035249
What I need to find now is a an earlier post that has a zero-hour and which still resolves normally. (They all worked before because I have always had at least a comment on each post for the past two years)
—
As a side issue:Now that I’m trying to verify the relation of the zero-hour to the issue, I’m becoming distracted by questions about the kind of relation between GUID and the permalink and the post’s time of creation as recorded in post_date.
To explain the cause of my confusion:
This post: http://zamakan.gharbeia.org/2007/04/23/222328 has its GUID set to http://zamakan.gharbeia.org/2007/04/24/000328 which is probably its true time of publication before I manually changed its timestamp through the editor interface to keep it on the day I want it on, which is the day I started working on it (two hours before midnight). I do this sometimes and it never caused problems.Despite of the discrepancy between the GUID in the DB and the permalink, the post is resolving normally.
Forum: Installing WordPress
In reply to: permalink not identified correctly (not fully decoded)But, moshu, this has been working perfectly for the past two years!
Besides, the idea is to try to solve this issue while keeping this permalink structure.
Actually, if I were to change it I would avoid the ID specifically because I don’t want anything that is implementation-specific. I’m writing a plug-in that will make comment IDs not dependent on their DB entries and thus enabling true permalinks for comments.
I’m afraid I’m a digital preservation freak 🙂
Forum: Requests and Feedback
In reply to: rel=”nofollow” on presentation onlyI’m still interested in this issue, and I wonder if anyone has insights into it.
Forum: Developing with WordPress
In reply to: hook before comment commitedAll hooks/filters were officially added and are officially supported.
This answers my question. Thank you.
Forum: Developing with WordPress
In reply to: hook before comment commitedThank you, milkb.
Is there a plan to incorporate that information in the codex?
I mean, there’s nothing preventing this from happening except maybe the needed volunteered effort, no?
A question (if you happen to know): Since the whole of the information there seems to be ‘unofficial’, does “undocumented” merely mean that there is no information about that specific hook/filter in there yet, or does it mean that the hook/filter is itself undocumented and using it is considered a hack?
Regards,
Forum: Requests and Feedback
In reply to: rel=”nofollow” on presentation only(both a commenter’s url and any in a comment’s contents) are handled dynamically, not written to the database.
hmm…this is strange! My comments table is full of
rel="nofollow"that were inserted by WordPress, while I have not installed any plugins pertaining to this.Also my understanding is that prior to 2.04 there was an issue that caused repeated
rel="nofollow"to be inserted in comments after they are edited.Am I missing something?
Forum: Everything else WordPress
In reply to: Tag for the name of the link category.I share the same need with Atoon.
It is true, Kafkaesqui, that you know the ID of the category when you pass it, but it is good to be able to control the categories’ names from Link Manager and leave the code alone, instead of hardcoding the categories’ names as titles in the template.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: Preventing repeated ‘rel=”nofollow”‘One problem with my approach is that if there’s one nofollow in the comment, no more will be added. This is what I just discovered.
The apprach suggested on Trac is better.