It’s not a new problem. I used to rearrange the images and the gap disappears. I used to move the images close to the gap.
Thanks for the reply.
That does seem to be a bit of a hit and miss workaround. Is there no css fix that can be applied, that will take care of the issue?
Thanks again
Hi steveb123,
I’m unable to reach your site…is the correct address?
Hi, I have been doing some testing on the error logs and it was off-line for a moment
I just looked now and it is there and on both pages of the gallery, there do not appear to be any gaps!!
It does seem a bit hit and miss although I am sure it is the client’s images that are the issue.
If it crops up again is there some way in the css that I can enlarge the frame to accommodate odd images?
Thanks for getting back to me, highly appreciated
Could it be a cached-related issue?
I have had few scenarios using cache plugins where galleries are wrongly displayed.
I’ve never used cache plugins but I also experienced it.
This is just a dev site, I have not installed any caching tools yet.
However it seems to be working fine at the present time, looking good
Thank you all for your input. Really appreciated
Now I can present the gap issue. This time only in the mobile version (using Jetpack for it) so maybe it’s not NexctCellent’s fault.
Use the mobile screen in horizontal mode and around the middle of the thumbnails you can see the issue (I used an LG G3 phone with Android):
http://www.weigertimages.com/photo/portrait-fashion-photography/
This happens because this image (http://www.weigertimages.com/wp-content/gallery/portrait/thumbs/thumbs_portrait-photo-072.jpg) is a pixel shorter than the rest. You can try remaking the thumbnail for this picture.
Thanks, I tried it!
Regarding the questioned image:
– If I select the image and choose “create new thumbnails”, then I get a 160×160 thumbnail, which is fine
– If I choose “edit thumb” and manually select the square area precisely, I get 160×159, which is not an exact square. I think, this is because the image has different proportions than the others and the calculation with the rounding gives a different result. What do you think?
I checked that in the wedding gallery I have a thumbnail with 159×160 and another thumbnail with 160×159 size. I checked the large images belonging to these thumbs and those instead of the regular 960×640 and 427×640 size (which are the regular sizes for my horizontal and vertical images) by accident have 640×960 and 419×640 pixel dimensions.
“Irregular” of different sizes don’t give an exact square thumbnail when manually editing the thumb (which is important) and when these thumbs with a pixel difference are in a certain position in the grid, gaps are created, even on a desktop display.
