Plugin Author
Soflyy
(@soflyy)
Unless I’m confused about who this is, and if I am, I apologize, we offered $100 to you (and ALL of our customers) if they sent us an example datafeed that we ended up using in a video tutorial, and said we’d pay in the case that we used the feed. In your case, initially we thought we’d use your feed and told you as much, but we later discovered that your feed had broken image URLs, and also that you didn’t have authorization to give us rights to use the feed in our examples. Sorry for misleading you. We won’t be using your file in an example, which means we won’t be sending you $100.
How about rating the quality of our product instead instead of giving us a 1 star review because you missed out on $100 by trying to sell us something that wasn’t even yours?
If this is NOT who I think it is, and something else is wrong, please tell me. We’d be happy to make it right.
Plugin Author
Soflyy
(@soflyy)
I’ve confirmed that I’m correct in my assumptions that mastafu is indeed Piotr Witwicki, who tried to sell us copyrighted content and bully us into paying him for it by making threats to spread negative comments about us on the Internet. We didn’t cave, and now we have to deal with the consequences.
Plugin Author
Soflyy
(@soflyy)
I understand why you feel misled – I said “This looks great – we’d love to use it. Please send me your PayPal e-mail address and I’ll send you $100.” and then discovered you don’t have authorization to sell the feed. But it’s the same as if you walked into a store, were ready to buy a product, and then discovered that it was stolen merchandise.
Rating us 1 star for your perception that we lack integrity is kind of ridiculous considering you tried to sell us copyrighted content which you do not own and do not have authorization to allow us to use.
