Help wrapping my brain around frameworks
-
I’m new and I’m trying to wrap my brain around frameworks. I read how wonderful they are (particularly for developers) and I understand why; however, I can’t differentiate how they are different from themes that have a lot of built in features (and which people appear to warn against those).
A custom theme with many additions and programmed settings is often said to be bad. One reason is security, but another popular reason is that you can’t change themes without possibly breaking your site. My understanding of frameworks is that they also have built in features (e.g. custom post types, templates) that prevent you from switching to an entirely new framework or non-framework theme. The only differentiation that I see is that one can switch between themes within the framework, so there is easier flexibility on the design side.
Perhaps frameworks are better programmed, and less server intensive than a bunch of plugins, but to me it appears that you can accomplish a lot of a framework’s features with plugins. I’m not saying that’s a better or more efficient method though.
I see benefits of a framework, but it looks like you have to live within the confines of the framework forever. In the end, to me, a framework looks like a kind of fork of WordPress. It’s still dependent on the base of WordPress, but it creates a unique version of WordPress.
I’m not a developer, and so maybe that’s the missing perspective, but as a guy that likes flexibility, it’s more appealing to use a starter theme, plugins, and customization. Am I totally missing the point?
The topic ‘Help wrapping my brain around frameworks’ is closed to new replies.