• Resolved saintehlers

    (@saintehlers)


    OK, I want to ask what makes the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (CC-BY-SA) incompatible with the GPL.

    This page states that CC-BY-SA is incompatible with the GPL when used for software.

    HOWEVER, the scenario is CC-BY-SA licensed images used in a GPL theme.

    Under CC-BY-SA, the images can be reused and altered so long as attribution remains. It permits re-distribution of altered or unaltered work, but does not enforce the re-distribution.

    Isn’t this what the GPL does? If GPL isn’t recommended for non-software (It CAN be used, but there’s a lot of ambiguity about what “source code” means when it comes to, say, images), then why not use CC-BY-SA for non-software elements of a theme?

    This article even talks about how the images (and even the CSS) are independent objects, even when distributed as part of the theme.

    So what is it that makes Creative Commons incompatible with GPL in this scenario?

Viewing 2 replies - 16 through 17 (of 17 total)
  • Moderator Ipstenu (Mika Epstein)

    (@ipstenu)

    🏳️‍🌈 Advisor and Activist

    GPL/License/copyright issues and ‘the rules of the WP forum’ are two different things. We don’t debate them because the decision is this: Only GPLv2 (or later) compatible themes and plugins may be hosted on WordPress.org

    You asked if they were incompatible. They’re are. That doesn’t mean you can’t use them together. Which is why I say yes and no 😉

    Can I make a GPLv2 compatible theme and include images that are CC (or any other non-GPL license) licensed? Yes. There’s precedence for dual licensing like that (sorry to remind everyone of that mess).

    Can I do that and host the theme or plugin here? No. We don’t permit it. Everything you check in here has to be GPL compatible, all across the board, no exceptions.

    What question is left?

    Moderator Samuel Wood (Otto)

    (@otto42)

    WordPress.org Admin

    I figured I’d go ahead and give an exact answer to this, despite all the talk-talk above about it.

    The CC-BY-SA 3.0 Unported license is incompatible with the GPL for one simple and specific reason.

    “You may not sublicense the Work.”

    Any given “work” rests under a license. The license is your terms by which the work-as-a-whole may be used/distributed/etc.

    In our repository, we require that the license for the work-as-a-whole be compatible with the GPL. This includes *everything* in the theme. CSS, images, everything. The whole ZIP of the theme must be GPL-compatible, and by extension, everything in there must be GPL-compatible. This is *our* restriction, we want it this way. WordPress itself is free-as-in-speech and we want to ensure that everything hosted else here on WordPress.org is just as free, to everybody, forever.

    So, because CC-BY-SA cannot be sublicensed, then that means it cannot be distributed in a work under the terms of the GPL. So it cannot be included in a GPL-compatible work-as-a-whole. So we don’t allow it here. This is actually for your protection, as an author. If you were to include CC-BY-SA images in your theme, and then say your theme is distributed under the terms of the GPL, then *you* are actually breaking *their* license. And because we’re hosting it, then so are we, by accident. Now, it’s not likely to cause any stir or ruckus or anything, but if we want people to respect our licensing conditions, then it’s only fair that we respect everybody else’s licensing conditions as well. Therefore our rules about GPL-compatibility are hard, fast, and unbreakable, period. Doesn’t matter how “free” you think the license is, if it’s not GPL-compatible, then it can not be on this site.

Viewing 2 replies - 16 through 17 (of 17 total)

The topic ‘Creative Commons verses GPL’ is closed to new replies.