Conflict With W3 Total cache

Resolved Amin
(@hooramin)

12 years ago

hello
after that the plugin changed “sitemap.xml” to virtual mod , it has conflict with w3 total cache plugin
when i empty disk cache of pages , with first view i can see my sitemap.xml without any problem

but after caching ,content of sitemap.xml changes to just some text without any link or style!

what should i do ?
https://wordpress.org/plugins/google-sitemap-generator/

Viewing 8 replies - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)

VolumeWatchers
(@volumewatchers)

12 years ago

Wait for Arnee’s answer. But, I have added this in W3TC under

Never cache the following pages:

sitemap\.xml
sitemap-.*\.xml
sitemap\.html
sitemap-.*\.html

See here:
http://wordpress.org/support/topic/general-http-error-404-not-found-http-error-404-405?replies=5

Thread Starter Amin
(@hooramin)

12 years ago

thanks for your reply

I did your idea before !

but actually its a problem for a plugin that conflicts with caching!

Arne
(@arnee)

12 years ago

Which type of caching do you use? W3TC has a issue saving the content type in some caching methods. Can you try APC or Basic Disk Cache for the Page Cache? I’m using APC Page cache on my own website and it works great with the sitemap plugin.

Thread Starter Amin
(@hooramin)

12 years ago

i’m using Disk:Enhanced For page caching now .

there isn’t any problem when i use “Disk:Basic” type for page caching

so you mean it’s a bug of W3TC ? should i report this problem to them ?

Arne
(@arnee)

12 years ago

I think I reported this already long time ago and they said it is a technical limitation. Is APC not available on your system? That should be faster than the file cache.

Thread Starter Amin
(@hooramin)

12 years ago

I use Zend Opcache in my server and with several tests and benchmark’s experience, I found that’s better than APC !
Unfortunately the zend-opcache not listed in caching type of W3TC!

And if your read this post :
https://rtcamp.com/wordpress-nginx/tutorials/single-site/w3-total-cache/

You ‘ll see the author of W3TC agreed with this options: “Page Cache – Disk Enhanced” !!

So are you sure the APC can be faster?
With this details, If you still recommend APC ,I’ll install and config APC on my server right now!

Arne
(@arnee)

12 years ago

Hi,

It is hard to generalize it, it always depends on the environment. At the end the difference is probably quite small.

Enhanced page disk completely passes php, since the cached files are static files served by apache. The drawback is that some things like additional headers can not be stored.

So Disk Basic and APC are the ones with the best compatibility, depending on the environment disk enhanced could be a little bit faster. But I don’t think it’s worth the issues.

Thread Starter Amin
(@hooramin)

12 years ago

Your answer helped me to understand that What is The enhanced disk caching work !

Thanks a lot for your care and support! ♥

Viewing 8 replies - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)

The topic ‘Conflict With W3 Total cache’ is closed to new replies.