wokat
Forum Replies Created
-
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [12 Step Meeting List] 12 Step Meeting List not happeningHej, great intel.
Yes, if you are on a managed hosting product, make sure that you use a service provided by the hoster, and that it auto-renews.
If you have SSH access you can also use clients like acme.sh, or certbot, if you have root access.
I believe those hacking-incidents probably are no worse than for other domain-validation certs. You have to be able to change the DNS or place files on the web server to show that you own a domain you are requesting a certificate for.
If an attacker is able to do that, your least concern is that cheap letsencrypt cert 😉
But yes, you need to renew more often, many people are using the service, your hoster could have implemented the renewal process weirdly, you have a kind of short time window in the automated process, so renewal might sometimes not work — If you notice that too late your site is pretty much inaccessible until you fix it by hand.
But I‘ll accept that danger over having to come up with 5 more bucks a month for a non-profit website /shrug.
Oh, this was off-topic now, ja? 😂💅
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [12 Step Meeting List] 12 Step Meeting List not happeningHej @osnicky59 and @cachevalleyaa,
I just heard you mention ssl-certificates and wanted to add a note:
By now you can probably find free certificates in your provider’s admin backend.
Search the interface for the keyword “letsencrypt”.
They are a free CA providing 3mo certificates that can be renewed automatically:
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [12 Step Meeting List] New Translations ready?Sorry, “s/b” meant “somebody”… Ah, sounds good. I assumed, this being the translation platform, it would be a good place… Will go to GitHub for everything dev next time.
Thanks.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [12 Step Meeting List] Add Meeting Type “Inter”Thanks, the meeting types local to our site work well.
Thank you for the link, too. Yes, I can see now how the LGBTQI-change could have become problematic.
And I had understood your reference in the PR to „you seeing no effort“ to mean no discussion about the topic going on, yet. So here I’ve started one.
So while keeping the list of filter criteria applying to a local set of meetings short is quite important for UX I still can‘t help thinking that this particular subset of very specific properties seems exclusory when applied in this manner. Obviously not having the two other tags would make this discussion superfluous.
I will talk to my meeting contact to see, whether I should take it to TIAA, then.
Thanks.