Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 replies - 31 through 45 (of 63 total)
  • Both should work—I tested it using Firebug—double-check the code. As for dropping down the sidebar content use CSS margin or padding on #sidebar or on the specific widget.

    Solution 1

    In the post editor switch to HTML mode and change

    <img class="alignright size-full wp-image-135" title="Border1" src="http://anthemfighting.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Border1.png" alt="" width="600" height="10">

    to

    <img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-135" title="Border1" src="http://anthemfighting.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Border1.png" alt="" width="930" height="10">

    and remove the other image from sidebar widget.

    Solution 2

    Create a CSS class called fullscreen and add it to images you want fullscreen.

    CSS (add the line below to the bottom of your stylesheet in Appearance » Editor)

    .fullscreen{width:930px !important;height:auto !important;float:none}

    HTML

    <img class="fullscreen alignnone size-full wp-image-135" title="Border1" src="http://anthemfighting.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Border1.png" alt="" width="600" height="10">

    The !important height/width overrides the height/width set in the <img> code. The float:none overrides the floats applied from the class alignright etc. If you use always use alignnone you don’t need that part.

    Thread Starter ryanve

    (@ryanve)

    @cyberbrent Google Analytics relies on the tracking code script. It’s totally independent from robots.txt. It looks like you got your robots.txt straightened out. Remember you can always see which URL’s are indexed by Google by searching for site:meninkilts.com

    Thread Starter ryanve

    (@ryanve)

    Problem solved by temporarily add flush_rewrite_rules(); as described here.
    I think the method in this article would work too: “Simply visit your Settings > Permalinks page. You don’t have to save your permalinks but just visit the page. This will flush your rewrite rules.”

    Thread Starter ryanve

    (@ryanve)

    Thanks – I guess I’m going to have to leave year/month sorting option on, although I do like to push the limits 😉 I imagine there is an Apache setting into the thousands.

    Thread Starter ryanve

    (@ryanve)

    Changing the uploads folder messed up the image URL for the [gallery] images.

    Thread Starter ryanve

    (@ryanve)

    I’m still trying to figure out if there is a way to do this. So far the only thing I’ve came up with is to uncheck the option in Settings » Media and then change the upload folder at the beginning of each year.

    I think it’s annoying when it’s sorted by month because sometimes you forget when exactly you uploaded something. The web index is sortable by date modified anyway, but I wonder, is there a performance advantage to using the year/month folders?

    Thread Starter ryanve

    (@ryanve)

    @ barbapapa – thanks yea this is for a client site—I’m trying to make it as simple as possible.

    Thread Starter ryanve

    (@ryanve)

    Thanks—will do!

    Thread Starter ryanve

    (@ryanve)

    Oh yea of course. =) I meant I think Disallow: /wp- disallows /wp-admin/ and /wp-content/ and /wp-includes/ or anything else that starts with /wp-

    I guess it doesn’t hurt to list all of them but it’s redundant isn’t it? Does it make a difference you think?

    Thread Starter ryanve

    (@ryanve)

    Cool—that’s interesting about the better results—thanks! I’d imagine too that Disallow: would give the same results as Allow: / and I guess the point is to give explicit instructions for the robots you want.

    I’m pretty sure that Disallow: /wp- disallows all the wp- folders. Is there a specific reason to disallow /wp-admin/ etc. separately?

    Thread Starter ryanve

    (@ryanve)

    I agree, I’m guessing they made a mistake b/c I’m pretty sure they don’t want to blacklist Google or those other engines. Those other files they blocked are 404s. I’m prob. going to recommend that they change it to something like:

    User-agent: Mediapartners-Google*
    Disallow:
    
    User-agent: *
    Disallow: /js/

    or simply

    User-agent: *
    Disallow: /js/

    I’m not sure if there’s an advantage to explicitly allowing Mediapartners. It should crawl it anyway as long as its not disallowed. Thanks again!

    Thread Starter ryanve

    (@ryanve)

    Thank you! I updated the photos to link to each profile—nice catch. We’re going to add a footer at some point too. The bottom part of the homepage is randomized. Initially we were just going to show 3 or 4 at a time but then put them all. You’re right—the ‘more »’ to the category/all/ is the same people (alphabetized). And IE7…’nuf said 😉

    Thread Starter ryanve

    (@ryanve)

    Thanks! Yes, odd is the word LOL. I also posted this same question on Aardvark and Yahoo Answers and I got opinions split. 3 out of 5 people that answered (including you) say it applies to all. No that’s not the whole file. See below:

    User-agent: googlebot
    User-agent: slurp
    User-agent: msnbot
    User-agent: teoma
    User-agent: W3C-checklink
    User-agent: WDG_SiteValidator
    Disallow: /
    Disallow: /js/
    Disallow: /Web_References/
    Disallow: /webresource.axd
    Disallow: /scriptresource.axd
    
    User-agent: Mediapartners-Google*
    Disallow:
    
    User-agent: *
    Disallow: /webresource.axd
    Disallow: /scriptresource.axd
    Disallow: /js/
    Disallow: /Web_References/

    It actually looks like they copied it from this article and then added redundancies. The pages on their site do show up in Google but they show up without snippets. The site has been online since the 90s.

    @ Ipstenu and Otto Thanks 🙂

Viewing 15 replies - 31 through 45 (of 63 total)