Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 replies - 421 through 435 (of 577 total)
  • Thread Starter nickaster

    (@nickaster)

    What genius decided that images should be linked by default? I have to spend 30 minutes every day now going though posts getting rid of these useless links which writers who don’t know any better add!

    Thread Starter nickaster

    (@nickaster)

    Hmm yeah, custom plugin?

    I love the feature. Frankly, I’d take anything that prevents people from accidentally linking the images to themselves (horrifically, the default)

    Thread Starter nickaster

    (@nickaster)

    This is driving me insane. Am I the only person who thinks this is a problem?

    Thread Starter nickaster

    (@nickaster)

    INcredible. Now the site is just cranking along STILL at over 2500 and hour with no trouble whatsoever. Does anyone out there have a clue how this is possible? Echo? Echo? echo?

    Thread Starter nickaster

    (@nickaster)

    So here’s what really blows my mind. Traffic has actually gone UP and the site is now faster. I’m getting 2500/hr and it’s speedy as can be. Two hours ago, with half that traffic the site barely loaded.

    Does anyone have a clue as to what could cause this flaky behaviour?

    Thread Starter nickaster

    (@nickaster)

    Interesting. Actually, maybe SuperCache is working after all. But at 2000/hr visitors, the site shouldn’t be this slow, should it?

    Thread Starter nickaster

    (@nickaster)

    ha, boom! so I restart my server and somehow it causes WP SuperCache to start working again. Then 5-10 minutes later it’s skunked again. Cache clearly not working.

    Any server experts think this is a setup problem, or a “need a fancier server” problem?

    Thread Starter nickaster

    (@nickaster)

    Hmm… maybe it’s just a browser thing. A new computer does show the proper comments, so I guess SuperCache is working, but good god, the site is slow. Might need to upgrade the server…..

    Forum: Fixing WordPress
    In reply to: PHP Help
    Thread Starter nickaster

    (@nickaster)

    Here’s another way to look at it….

    Apparantly, my public feed is working fine: http://triplepundit.com/feed/

    But maybe that’s just because it’s going through FeedBurner?

    How do I simply create a second RSS feed? One that’s exactly the same, but has full content? I’m very confused as to why this is difficult!

    Forum: Fixing WordPress
    In reply to: PHP Help
    Thread Starter nickaster

    (@nickaster)

    Heya – well, the guys are telling me the following:

    “I have been working through creation of the iPhone app for you and we’re having an issue with the feed you’re providing. The iPhone RSS consumers seem to be having a difficult time with the markup showing up in the item elements. I see you have it marked with a CDATA section but it’s not being respected as such. Is it possible for you to escape the content? That’s what we’re doing and it seems to be working so I’m more confident in using that approach than trying to debug the CDATA issue.”

    I’m in over my head here. I’m perfectly capable of editing an RSS feed or HTML, but the way WordPress generates it is totally greek to me. Does anyone have any idea what the above means? or a solution?

    Thanks!

    Forum: Fixing WordPress
    In reply to: PHP Help
    Thread Starter nickaster

    (@nickaster)

    Fantastic, it works!

    …basically, there’s a guy who wants to syndicate my content in a creative way and we want to include the whole post, not just the exceprt (which is my prefernce for the default feed).

    So I need a new RSS feed with full content. I also want to style it a little bit once that’s fixed.

    Thread Starter nickaster

    (@nickaster)

    Well, at least I understand the problem now. Thanks for your help!

    Thread Starter nickaster

    (@nickaster)

    Yeah, but I specifically ask my writers to re-size images BEFORE putting them in the posts. I think it’s great that wordpress now can do this for you, but it just confuses readers to have a clickable image that, in most cases, just goes to a page with an image on it, so unless there’s a good reason to (like some kind of large chart), I’d much prefer the images do NOT become clickable by default.

    Thread Starter nickaster

    (@nickaster)

    Yeah, but it’s bad practice to force the browser to make a thumbnail (in my opinion) – slows down the site a lot. This is driving me nuts. All 6 of my latest posts from 6 different authors have this problem. THese are not web saavy people and no matter how many times I explain it, they nod, but don’t understand. There’s no question that somehow the default became the “linked” version….

    Thread Starter nickaster

    (@nickaster)

    Yeah, that’s what I thought, but it doesn’t make much sense that EVERYONE is now getting saddled with the link choice. For a dozen writers to suddenly start doing it whereas none were before seems odd…. was there some development in a recent upgrade that made this the default? More importantly, why would anyone ever want to do this? It’s a real nuisance to readers!

Viewing 15 replies - 421 through 435 (of 577 total)