Forum Replies Created

Viewing 7 replies - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Comments that are recognized as spam by WordPress get the “spam” approved value. Those won’t show up in the moderation queue. There are several additional rules that make out comments as spam in WordPress – for example HTML numerical entities in the standard ASCII range. So spam showing up in the table but not the queue is perfectly fine with 1.5. Even though I think there should be a way for the user to see what happened and to give at least an overview by date to see _that_ something happened.

    Forum: Plugins
    In reply to: WordPress File Manager Hack

    The files are again missing – only the .rar file is available and that can’t be extracted with unrar under linux. Please only post hacks and plugins in either .zip or .tgz format, as other formats are not available on all plattforms.

    Thread Starter hugo

    (@hugo)

    But WP _does_ send a content type already with the Content-Type meta tag – adding the exact content type and charset you use there wouldn’t do any more damage as already is done.
    AddDefaultCharset none can only be set in .htaccess if the appropriate options override is allowed for that server configuration. You can’t be sure that this is allways the case. So I think it would be better to add a content-type selection/entry to the preferences to allow HTTP buffs to do what they want and set this to default text/html (as is now the case with the meta tag) and send this out via header(…) call. That way people without the know will get the expected results and pro-users can easily override everything.

    Forum: Plugins
    In reply to: New Pluign: Faked Folders

    BTW: if you patch wp-admin/edit-post-advanced.php to include “static” as a status option for post editing, you will be able to edit static pages without the problem that the status is reset to draft on each edit.

    Forum: Plugins
    In reply to: New Pluign: Faked Folders

    Weird. The plugins are now loaded correctly, the only thing that still is missing is the $p thing. Don’t know why and don’t know how, but it does work now. Nonetheless it’s exactly the plugin I waited for 😉

    Forum: Plugins
    In reply to: New Pluign: Faked Folders

    Ok, more digging, more problems 😉
    I now understand where templates are stored and how to work with them. I did discover though that there are some problems with plugins and faked folders. Somehow my plugins don’t get loaded, the defined functions in the plugins are not available.
    Another problem I found was that the rewrite rules do create a p= parameter, but the plugin itself does try to use the p parameter, but it isn’t set from $_GET[]. You do check $_GET[‘static’], but you use $p directly. I don’t understand what the use of isset ($name) is in your plugin code where you “take over” wordpress, as that variable is nowhere defined. The $p not initialized problem is easily overcome by pulling it out of the $_GET[] array. But the problem with the plugins is still there.
    I do use WordPress 1.2.

    Forum: Plugins
    In reply to: New Pluign: Faked Folders

    Additional problem: your plugin conflicts with the wpstats plugin. The call to the_stats does break when you access a static page. Actually this came into play by using the default template – you use the index.php page for this? You might want to elaborate a bit more on what to do with templates and where to place them.

Viewing 7 replies - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)