Compatibility with Memcached

  • danushkaj91

    (@danushkaj91)


    6 years, 9 months ago

    Thanks for the great plugin.

    Can we improve the speed by using Memcached? Or are there any known compatibility issues?

    Thanks
    Danu

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Plugin Author Mikko Saari

    (@msaari)

    6 years, 9 months ago

    I don’t know, but Relevanssi doesn’t really have an opinion either. Relevanssi just works under the hood and provides results. Caching is something that’s best done on other levels, ie. caching the search results pages. I can’t really see a reason why you couldn’t have something cache the search results pages. Not really sure if any other level of caching would make sense.

    Thread Starter danushkaj91

    (@danushkaj91)

    6 years, 9 months ago

    Thanks for the help, btw GREAT PLUGIN!

    I was thinking Relevanssi creates a separate table with the indexed values and searches in that table, rather than searching on the wp-postmeta table. But I’ve only used Relevanssi for 3 days so far, so I could be super wrong.

    So I was thinking (assuming Relevanssi creates and searches on a seperate table), maybe better to push the data from that table to memory and potentially have a performance increase…

    • This reply was modified 6 years, 9 months ago by danushkaj91.
    Plugin Author Mikko Saari

    (@msaari)

    6 years, 9 months ago

    Relevanssi uses a separate table, yes, the search index is in wp_relevanssi. If you can cache the Relevanssi table in memory, that should be a significant performance boost compared to using it from the disk. That’s something the server should worry about, I think, and I don’t see why Relevanssi would have problems with that.

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)

The topic ‘Compatibility with Memcached’ is closed to new replies.