So when are we putting up a Kubrick forum?
So when are we putting up a Kubrick forum?
We don't see what I would say is sufficient questions specific to Kubrick to justify another forum do we ?
Michael has a very good FAQ, and isn't there some sort of flickr / multiply type group too ?
If such a forum would be useful, then sure, why not but I can't see it being so. For a whole host of reasons I'm not about to go into because to do so would be to loosen lids on cans of worms which are best kept shut, I wouldn't vote for such a forum.
besides such a forum should be the resposibility of the template owner - and I think this holds true for any template creator - if they want to.
Tg
Gentlemen? Thank you for your input. I'm sure many of us will get something from it. However, two points:
Let's hope sarcasm isn't dead for 2005. Otherwise I'm in big trouble.
Isnt this covered by "Templates and Design"?
"It's dead, Jim."
~sigh~
maybe facetiousness is dead in 2005 ;-)
The benefit of facetiousness is that it can muddle along on life-support for decades.
This topic has been closed to new replies.