Title: Elyx's Replies | WordPress.org --- # Elyx [ ](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/) * [Profile](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/) * [Topics Started](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/topics/) * [Replies Created](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/replies/) * [Reviews Written](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/reviews/) * [Topics Replied To](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/replied-to/) * [Engagements](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/engagements/) * [Favorites](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/favorites/) Search replies: ## Forum Replies Created Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 45 total) 1 [2](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/replies/page/2/?output_format=md) [3](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/replies/page/3/?output_format=md) [→](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/replies/page/2/?output_format=md) * Forum: [Plugins](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/plugins-and-hacks/) In reply to: [[Essential Addons for Elementor - Popular Elementor Templates & Widgets] Data Table empty link](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/data-table-empty-link/) * Thread Starter [Elyx](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/) * (@kokers) * [1 year, 6 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/data-table-empty-link/#post-18107982) * Looks good, thank you for the fast fix. Do you know when next update is scheduled? * Forum: [Plugins](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/plugins-and-hacks/) In reply to: [[Restricted Site Access] Non-whitelisted IP address was able to view site](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/non-whitelisted-ip-address-was-able-to-view-site/) * [Elyx](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/) * (@kokers) * [6 years, 11 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/non-whitelisted-ip-address-was-able-to-view-site/#post-11608904) * My first guest would be some caching issue (he saw cached paged). Are you using any caching plugins? * Forum: [Fixing WordPress](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/how-to-and-troubleshooting/) In reply to: [Visual Editor – Flashing Insert/Edit Link Popup](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/visual-editor-flashing-insert-edit-link-popup/) * [Elyx](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/) * (@kokers) * [7 years, 1 month ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/visual-editor-flashing-insert-edit-link-popup/#post-11407036) * In my case it was scrollbar setting in macOS set to “Always” that cause the issue. Changing it to “Show when scrolling” solved it for the time being. * Issue on github [https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/issues/14878](https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/issues/14878) * Forum: [Plugins](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/plugins-and-hacks/) In reply to: [[Multiple Domain] not working anymore on my website](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/not-working-anymore-on-my-website/) * [Elyx](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/) * (@kokers) * [7 years, 2 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/not-working-anymore-on-my-website/#post-11295262) * Seems last update broke MD replace url, created an bug report on github. Reversing to previous release fixed the issue for the time being. * Forum: [Plugins](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/plugins-and-hacks/) In reply to: [[Offers for WooCommerce] Closed plugin](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/closed-plugin-2/) * Thread Starter [Elyx](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/) * (@kokers) * [7 years, 2 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/closed-plugin-2/#post-11275413) * Then either they moving to the paid plugin, or there is something wrong. Plugin was closed by WP team and the link on their page is not working because they closed their github repository where they also kept their code and some issue tracker, there is no info about it here or facebook or anywhere on their page about this “transition”, so it doesn’t really look ok to me. We were going to use it cause it was really promising, but it’s very odd what is happening now and how the plugin is closed in WP and there is no info from the angelleye team. - This reply was modified 7 years, 2 months ago by [Elyx](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/). * Forum: [Plugins](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/plugins-and-hacks/) In reply to: [[Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®)] Conflict with gutenberg](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/conflict-with-gutenberg-4/) * [Elyx](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/) * (@kokers) * [7 years, 5 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/conflict-with-gutenberg-4/#post-10957163) * [@badro0](https://wordpress.org/support/users/badro0/) developer is not to be blamed. There is an issue with Gutenberg raised BEFORE WP 5.0 was released and even tho fix was possible, it wouldn’t be added to initial release but to the 5.0.1 that will be released in about 2 weeks [https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/issues/12571](https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/issues/12571) * So it’s not always up to themes and plugins developers and putting this on them is just unfair. * Also same issue and more information on ACF support forum [https://support.advancedcustomfields.com/forums/topic/every-field-group-listed-when-using-gutenberg/](https://support.advancedcustomfields.com/forums/topic/every-field-group-listed-when-using-gutenberg/) - This reply was modified 7 years, 5 months ago by [Elyx](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/). * Forum: [Plugins](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/plugins-and-hacks/) In reply to: [[All-In-One Security (AIOS) – Security and Firewall] Contact form 7 doesn’t work with the feature “Users enumeration”](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/contact-form-7-doesnt-work-with-the-feature-users-enumeration/) * [Elyx](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/) * (@kokers) * [7 years, 10 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/contact-form-7-doesnt-work-with-the-feature-users-enumeration/#post-10430016) * Disable REST API should have it’s own setting, but option to disable only authors should stay. Maybe target just the author endpoint, like so [https://wordpress.stackexchange.com/a/254251/90495](https://wordpress.stackexchange.com/a/254251/90495) * Forum: [Reviews](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/reviews/) In reply to: [[LiteSpeed Cache] Some great things… others, not so much](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/some-great-things-others-not-so-much/) * [Elyx](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/) * (@kokers) * [8 years, 1 month ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/some-great-things-others-not-so-much/#post-10124904) * [@schaon](https://wordpress.org/support/users/schaon/) you might want to give it another try, because this has been improved in latest release via [https://wordpress.org/support/topic/slow-css-js-processing/](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/slow-css-js-processing/) * Forum: [Plugins](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/plugins-and-hacks/) In reply to: [[LiteSpeed Cache] Slow CSS/JS processing](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/slow-css-js-processing/) * Thread Starter [Elyx](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/) * (@kokers) * [8 years, 1 month ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/slow-css-js-processing/#post-10108350) * For anyone interested in the solution for slow css/js processing, we’ve talked with Hai on slack, and there will be some changes that address this issues in next release. * Thanks team. * Forum: [Plugins](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/plugins-and-hacks/) In reply to: [[LiteSpeed Cache] Slow CSS/JS processing](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/slow-css-js-processing/) * Thread Starter [Elyx](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/) * (@kokers) * [8 years, 1 month ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/slow-css-js-processing/#post-10107774) * Awesome news :o) I’ve already got github notification. Thanks for that. * Although the problem with slow minifying still exists. I’ll try to prepare case study for that with more “readable” data for you during weekend. * Forum: [Plugins](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/plugins-and-hacks/) In reply to: [[LiteSpeed Cache] Slow CSS/JS processing](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/slow-css-js-processing/) * Thread Starter [Elyx](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/) * (@kokers) * [8 years, 1 month ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/slow-css-js-processing/#post-10101043) * [@lclarke](https://wordpress.org/support/users/lclarke/) if links to pingdom reports would be more helpful than just numbers, find me on your community slack channel and I’ll be happy to pass them via PM. * Overall, CSS/JS optimization isn’t great. * Also this post was held for moderation. Do you have by any chance information as Plugin Support why this happened? * Forum: [Plugins](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/plugins-and-hacks/) In reply to: [[Fast Velocity Minify] Future of combining files with HTTP/2](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/future-of-combining-files-with-http-2/) * Thread Starter [Elyx](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/) * (@kokers) * [8 years, 2 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/future-of-combining-files-with-http-2/#post-10093672) * But minification is very important part of optimization, and I never had any issues with that in FVM, when in other plugins (which is surprising) i had. Your plugin isn’t ONLY for merging and minifying resources, but there as tons of other options that are useful (font options, preconnect headers, cdn, pro tab, and who knows what you’ll add in the future ;o)). Optimization isn’t only about concatenation. Concatenation is something we invented to deal with http/1 restrictions, but every other part is needed for both http/1 and http/2. That’s what I think. I’m really interested to hear why you think FVM won’t make sense if you add such option. * Forum: [Plugins](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/plugins-and-hacks/) In reply to: [[Fast Velocity Minify] Future of combining files with HTTP/2](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/future-of-combining-files-with-http-2/) * Thread Starter [Elyx](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/) * (@kokers) * [8 years, 2 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/future-of-combining-files-with-http-2/#post-10092740) * Hey Raul! * One more question related to this topic, as recently most websites I optimize work on http/2. Will it be possible to add a feature to disable concatenation all together? Meaning, use FVM for minification and compression but do not combine resources? Currently we can only disable minification, but we can’t disable merging. With few JS/CSS and http/2 there is no need to combine them, but it would be great to still be able to minify them and create gz version. So basically for websites with http/2 there could be an option to make small packages or just make them smaller. What do you think? * Forum: [Plugins](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/plugins-and-hacks/) In reply to: [[Fast Velocity Minify] Future of combining files with HTTP/2](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/future-of-combining-files-with-http-2/) * Thread Starter [Elyx](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/) * (@kokers) * [8 years, 2 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/future-of-combining-files-with-http-2/#post-10085735) * Hey Raul, * thanks again for your time. That’s a very good news. All the best :o) * Forum: [Plugins](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/plugins-and-hacks/) In reply to: [[Fast Velocity Minify] Future of combining files with HTTP/2](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/future-of-combining-files-with-http-2/) * Thread Starter [Elyx](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/) * (@kokers) * [8 years, 2 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/future-of-combining-files-with-http-2/#post-10084779) * Hi, thanks for a reply. * I agree with everything you said. But even with http/2 we still be merging files but into smaller packages. Even with http2 there will be a limit of how many files can be downloaded at once, and will probably depend on browsers as well. * My thought was simply to allow user to set a limit how many files are per package, similar how bwp minify was doing it with “one minify string contain” ([https://wordpress.org/plugins/bwp-minify/](https://wordpress.org/plugins/bwp-minify/)). * Option to ignore files doesn’t really solves this. I do not request this for tools like pingdom, pagespeed – gtmetrix is aware of http2. I simply want to prepare for a near future, beacuse https will soon be “a must”, and with that http2 will become more popular. I’m looking for a best solution to handle this for my and my clients sites where we do use http2 and all our new websites will too. * FVM is in my opinion the best plugin for minifying and combining, hence I wanted to see if splitting into smaller packages will be an option. When I was referring that concatenating will be obsolete – i was talking about theory. Practice always is different and tests proves this. * From [https://medium.com/@asyncmax/the-right-way-to-bundle-your-assets-for-faster-sites-over-http-2-437c37efe3ff](https://medium.com/@asyncmax/the-right-way-to-bundle-your-assets-for-faster-sites-over-http-2-437c37efe3ff) “ In order to enhance browser’s cache performance, create smaller bundles instead of one gigantic bundle. Each bundle should have a set of related asset files. If a bundle consists of related assets, most changes in a group can be contained locally without impacting other groups.” * Also what you said about mainstream. I don’t believe people should wait until everyone use this, but it’s my opinion. I personally want what’s best and http2 is clearly a way to go. If you see in caniuse the usage, it’s already 85% global and in my country it’s 92%. So it’s not something that won’t be popular soon, and whether tests do support this or not, we will have to deal with http2. We still be combining, but into smaller files. JS/CSS are not the only files that are downlaoded in 1 tcp connection. Images, fonts also use this connection. * Anyway, thanks for consideration. Love the plugin, recommend it to everyone. Have a great day :o) Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 45 total) 1 [2](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/replies/page/2/?output_format=md) [3](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/replies/page/3/?output_format=md) [→](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kokers/replies/page/2/?output_format=md)