Title: eigood's Replies | WordPress.org --- # eigood [ ](https://wordpress.org/support/users/eigood/) * [Profile](https://wordpress.org/support/users/eigood/) * [Topics Started](https://wordpress.org/support/users/eigood/topics/) * [Replies Created](https://wordpress.org/support/users/eigood/replies/) * [Reviews Written](https://wordpress.org/support/users/eigood/reviews/) * [Topics Replied To](https://wordpress.org/support/users/eigood/replied-to/) * [Engagements](https://wordpress.org/support/users/eigood/engagements/) * [Favorites](https://wordpress.org/support/users/eigood/favorites/) Search replies: ## Forum Replies Created Viewing 10 replies - 1 through 10 (of 10 total) * Forum: [Plugins](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/plugins-and-hacks/) In reply to: [[Insert Pages] Privacy protections added in 3.7.0 break direct shortcode calls](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/privacy-protections-added-in-3-7-0-break-direct-shortcode-calls/) * Thread Starter [eigood](https://wordpress.org/support/users/eigood/) * (@eigood) * [3 years, 11 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/privacy-protections-added-in-3-7-0-break-direct-shortcode-calls/#post-15779508) * So, yeah no. If I switch to “normal” mode, then when I do page=”/path/_nav”, I actually get a re-insertion of the *current* page I’m looking at. If I stay with “legacy”. and use my patch, I actually get the referenced page. So normal mode doesn’t look at given page attribute at all. * Looking further at the code, line 426 contains the same security check as mentioned previously, but in this case, it happens *above* the wpip_insert_method condition. * Forum: [Plugins](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/plugins-and-hacks/) In reply to: [[Insert Pages] Privacy protections added in 3.7.0 break direct shortcode calls](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/privacy-protections-added-in-3-7-0-break-direct-shortcode-calls/) * Thread Starter [eigood](https://wordpress.org/support/users/eigood/) * (@eigood) * [3 years, 11 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/privacy-protections-added-in-3-7-0-break-direct-shortcode-calls/#post-15779476) * That’s got it; it wasn’t clear that your suggestion was to update in the global settings area, instead of just setting a new option on the shortcode itself. * Forum: [Plugins](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/plugins-and-hacks/) In reply to: [[Insert Pages] Privacy protections added in 3.7.0 break direct shortcode calls](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/privacy-protections-added-in-3-7-0-break-direct-shortcode-calls/) * Thread Starter [eigood](https://wordpress.org/support/users/eigood/) * (@eigood) * [3 years, 11 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/privacy-protections-added-in-3-7-0-break-direct-shortcode-calls/#post-15779469) * I take it back, that does *not* work. * Forum: [Plugins](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/plugins-and-hacks/) In reply to: [[Insert Pages] Privacy protections added in 3.7.0 break direct shortcode calls](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/privacy-protections-added-in-3-7-0-break-direct-shortcode-calls/) * Thread Starter [eigood](https://wordpress.org/support/users/eigood/) * (@eigood) * [3 years, 11 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/privacy-protections-added-in-3-7-0-break-direct-shortcode-calls/#post-15779467) * wpip_insert_method=”normal” works, but can’t users themselves set that parameter inside post content areas? * Forum: [Plugins](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/plugins-and-hacks/) In reply to: [[Insert Pages] Privacy protections added in 3.7.0 break direct shortcode calls](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/privacy-protections-added-in-3-7-0-break-direct-shortcode-calls/) * Thread Starter [eigood](https://wordpress.org/support/users/eigood/) * (@eigood) * [3 years, 11 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/privacy-protections-added-in-3-7-0-break-direct-shortcode-calls/#post-15765874) * ``` diff --git a/www/wp-content/plugins/insert-pages/insert-pages.php b/www/wp-content/plugins/insert-pages/insert-pages.php index b462d24c..9412e583 100644 --- a/www/wp-content/plugins/insert-pages/insert-pages.php +++ b/www/wp-content/plugins/insert-pages/insert-pages.php @@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ if ( ! class_exists( 'InsertPagesPlugin' ) ) { if ( have_posts() ) { $can_read = true; $parent_post_author_id = intval( get_the_author_meta( 'ID' ) ); - foreach ( $posts as $post ) { + if ($parent_post_author_id) foreach ( $posts as $post ) { $post_type = get_post_type_object( $post->post_type ); if ( ! user_can( $parent_post_author_id, $post_type->cap->read_post, $post->ID ) ) { $can_read = false; ``` * ` - This reply was modified 3 years, 11 months ago by [eigood](https://wordpress.org/support/users/eigood/). * Forum: [Plugins](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/plugins-and-hacks/) In reply to: [[Stock Quote] Can no longer list the %ltrade% value](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/can-no-longer-list-the-ltrade-value/) * Thread Starter [eigood](https://wordpress.org/support/users/eigood/) * (@eigood) * [7 years, 9 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/can-no-longer-list-the-ltrade-value/#post-10644162) * I can do some work on this; for 0.1.7.1, I also had implemented a background type fetch, as originally it would block the main php process, and under heavy load, when the cache became invalid, there would be a storm of updates. I did it with a system-level cron, tho. * The timeline required by the client needs me to move on, but I can work on this in my spare time. * Forum: [Plugins](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/plugins-and-hacks/) In reply to: [[Stock Quote] Fix for api breakage](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/fix-for-api-breakage/) * Thread Starter [eigood](https://wordpress.org/support/users/eigood/) * (@eigood) * [8 years, 9 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/fix-for-api-breakage/#post-9490074) * At least 1.c is bad, for a wordpress plugin. But actually, section 1 says you can charge, but then 1.c rescinds that. Very odd. But we must err on the side of caution, so I agree that IEX is out. * Forum: [Plugins](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/plugins-and-hacks/) In reply to: [[Stock Quote] Fix for api breakage](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/fix-for-api-breakage/) * Thread Starter [eigood](https://wordpress.org/support/users/eigood/) * (@eigood) * [8 years, 9 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/fix-for-api-breakage/#post-9487251) * Or: [https://iextrading.com/developer/docs/](https://iextrading.com/developer/docs/) * Forum: [Plugins](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/plugins-and-hacks/) In reply to: [[Stock Quote] Fix for api breakage](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/fix-for-api-breakage/) * Thread Starter [eigood](https://wordpress.org/support/users/eigood/) * (@eigood) * [8 years, 9 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/fix-for-api-breakage/#post-9486634) * I’d rather not, as the author has said it’s not allowed for an official plugin. I want to honor his recommendation. * However, it wasn’t that hard to figure out the correct fields to request, and to then parse the csv and convert it to stdClass instance. * I’m currently looking at [https://www.alphavantage.co/](https://www.alphavantage.co/), but this requires an API key. That’d mean the plugin would need to have a config value for that key. * Forum: [Plugins](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/plugins-and-hacks/) In reply to: [[Stock Quote] Fix for api breakage](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/fix-for-api-breakage/) * Thread Starter [eigood](https://wordpress.org/support/users/eigood/) * (@eigood) * [8 years, 9 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/fix-for-api-breakage/#post-9480991) * Bother. Then my fix will work for my client for the weekend, at least. I’ll look more next week. Viewing 10 replies - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)