Title: ChristopherScott's Replies | WordPress.org

---

# ChristopherScott

  [  ](https://wordpress.org/support/users/christopherscott/)

 *   [Profile](https://wordpress.org/support/users/christopherscott/)
 *   [Topics Started](https://wordpress.org/support/users/christopherscott/topics/)
 *   [Replies Created](https://wordpress.org/support/users/christopherscott/replies/)
 *   [Reviews Written](https://wordpress.org/support/users/christopherscott/reviews/)
 *   [Topics Replied To](https://wordpress.org/support/users/christopherscott/replied-to/)
 *   [Engagements](https://wordpress.org/support/users/christopherscott/engagements/)
 *   [Favorites](https://wordpress.org/support/users/christopherscott/favorites/)

 Search replies:

## Forum Replies Created

Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)

 *   Forum: [Themes and Templates](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/themes-and-templates/)
   
   In reply to: [[Decode] Maxiumum image width is too narrow](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/maxiumum-image-width-is-too-narrow/)
 *  Thread Starter [ChristopherScott](https://wordpress.org/support/users/christopherscott/)
 * (@christopherscott)
 * [10 years, 9 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/maxiumum-image-width-is-too-narrow/#post-6452116)
 * That is tremendously helpful! I’ve added that code (although I’ve adjusted the
   width to `1024px`) and resized all of my site’s thumbnails; all images now display
   properly. I haven’t noticed any issues with the rest of the site’s layout after
   implementing the fix.
 * It would be ideal if the theme itself were updated to correct this behaviour.
   Since it breaks basic WordPress functionality, I think it’s fair to consider 
   it a bug. For now, I’ll have to use a child theme to force this fix.
 * I haven’t yet marked this topic as resolved since the theme itself still has 
   this issue. Hopefully we’ll hear back from the developer.
 *   Forum: [Themes and Templates](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/themes-and-templates/)
   
   In reply to: [[Decode] Hide "Leave a Comment"](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/hide-leave-a-comment-1/)
 *  [ChristopherScott](https://wordpress.org/support/users/christopherscott/)
 * (@christopherscott)
 * [10 years, 9 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/hide-leave-a-comment-1/#post-6016685)
 * If you would like to allow comments but just remove the “leave a comment” link
   on the main page, then consider adding the following code to your CSS stylesheet:
 * >  `/*`
   >  `* Hide the "Leave a comment" link on the front page.` `*/` `.comments-
   > link {` `display: none;` `}`
 * If you’re using Jetpack, add this under `Appearance > Edit CSS` so that your 
   changes persist between theme updates.
 * As a general note, it’s my opinion that the “Leave a comment” link doesn’t make
   much sense for blogs that display excerpts on the main page. There’s not much
   reason to provide a link to the comment field before the reader has had a chance
   to read the post. Given that this is a relatively common use-case, it’s surprising
   that the theme bakes in that link and doesn’t provide a convenient way to remove
   it without disabling comments entirely, which is fairly extreme.
 *   Forum: [Plugins](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/plugins-and-hacks/)
    In
   reply to: [[Plugin: Jetpack by WordPress.com] Tiled Galleries not using $content_width](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/plugin-jetpack-by-wordpresscom-tiled-galleries-not-using-content_width/)
 *  Thread Starter [ChristopherScott](https://wordpress.org/support/users/christopherscott/)
 * (@christopherscott)
 * [11 years, 2 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/plugin-jetpack-by-wordpresscom-tiled-galleries-not-using-content_width/#post-5815192)
 * I have updated my site to use a child theme of Decode. I used the exact same 
   code as copied above in the `functions.php` of the child theme, and the issue
   was resolved. I suspect that `$content_width` is first set outside of the `functions.
   php` file in the Decode theme.
 * I hope that this helps someone else having a similar issue!
 *   Forum: [Themes and Templates](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/themes-and-templates/)
   
   In reply to: [[Decode] Featured images use full-resolution (slow to load)](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/featured-images-use-full-resolution-slow-to-load/)
 *  Thread Starter [ChristopherScott](https://wordpress.org/support/users/christopherscott/)
 * (@christopherscott)
 * [11 years, 8 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/featured-images-use-full-resolution-slow-to-load/#post-5225633)
 * I thought a little bit about how I might implement this, and here’s what came
   to mind (keep in mind, though, that my dev days are long behind me!):
 * My thinking is that a drop-down menu could be included on the Appearance > Customize
   pane for the theme that allows users to select an image resolution. The drop-
   down could be placed under “Content Options”, right after “Display a post’s featured
   image on its individual page”. The drop-down menu could be implemented with options
   such as “thumbnail”, “medium”, “large”, and “full” (which are all natively supported
   values for `$size` when calling `the_post_thumbnail($size)`).
 * One advantage of this approach is that users can set resolutions for “thumbnail”,“
   medium”, and “large” at Settings > Media, and these resolutions apply site-wide,
   so it gives them pretty flexible control over image sizes. You can even default
   to “full” and retain the current functionality, while providing an option to 
   downscale for people who need it. Alternatively, instead of defaulting to “full”,
   you could add a new “header” image size (e.g. via [`add_image_size()`](http://codex.wordpress.org/Function_Reference/add_image_size)),
   set it to an appropriate size for HiDPI displays (2048×2048 or ‘large’, whichever
   is bigger?), and use that as the default setting for featured images. That way,
   you’d be using a sensible resolution by default, and users could still change
   the size of the header through the drop-down menu if they need to.
 * For me, this sort of solution actually helps _avoid_ messing with my images. 
   Every other image on my site is in “large” resolution; if header images are the
   odd ones out, that’s an issue (especially if they’re very large images). By letting
   me choose the image size, that’s not messing with anything — that’s allowing 
   my site to be consistent. If I hadn’t worked out a fix, I would have had to go
   through and destructively downscale all of my full-size header images (or remove
   featured images from each post), because using those images in their original
   full resolutions made my site nearly unusable.
 * Anyways, I hope you’ll consider implementing some sort of resolution-selection
   feature, whether or not it looks like the above! None of this is meant as a criticism—
   I really do love the theme. It’s pretty much perfect — it’s responsive, it offers
   flexible customization, and it has an attractive minimalist aesthetic. You’ve
   done fantastic work here.

Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)