Title: andreib's Replies | WordPress.org

---

# andreib

  [  ](https://wordpress.org/support/users/andreib/)

 *   [Profile](https://wordpress.org/support/users/andreib/)
 *   [Topics Started](https://wordpress.org/support/users/andreib/topics/)
 *   [Replies Created](https://wordpress.org/support/users/andreib/replies/)
 *   [Reviews Written](https://wordpress.org/support/users/andreib/reviews/)
 *   [Topics Replied To](https://wordpress.org/support/users/andreib/replied-to/)
 *   [Engagements](https://wordpress.org/support/users/andreib/engagements/)
 *   [Favorites](https://wordpress.org/support/users/andreib/favorites/)

 Search replies:

## Forum Replies Created

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

 *   Forum: [Everything else WordPress](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/miscellaneous/)
   
   In reply to: [Again about GPL licencing thems](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/again-about-gpl-licencing-thems/)
 *  [andreib](https://wordpress.org/support/users/andreib/)
 * (@andreib)
 * [16 years, 10 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/again-about-gpl-licencing-thems/#post-1130719)
 * I found an article with a legal analysis of the “plugins must be GPL’d” claim(**
   written by lawyers** for a change):
 * [http://www.law.washington.edu/lct/swp/Law/derivative.html](http://www.law.washington.edu/lct/swp/Law/derivative.html)
 * It call such claims “absurd”. It’s a long article but it’s well worth a read.
 *   Forum: [Fixing WordPress](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/how-to-and-troubleshooting/)
   
   In reply to: [Non-GPL plugins](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/non-gpl-plugins/)
 *  [andreib](https://wordpress.org/support/users/andreib/)
 * (@andreib)
 * [16 years, 10 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/non-gpl-plugins/#post-1108080)
 * I found an article with a legal analysis of the “plugins must be GPL’d” claim(**
   written by lawyers** for a change):
 * [http://www.law.washington.edu/lct/swp/Law/derivative.html](http://www.law.washington.edu/lct/swp/Law/derivative.html)
 * It call such claims “absurd”. It’s a long article but it’s well worth a read.

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)