XHTML validating & the <!--more--> tag (4 posts)

  1. mat8iou
    Posted 11 years ago #

    On my site I have a lot of posts that are a couple of lines introduction followed by a lengthy blockquote.
    I want to have the <!--more--> tag a couple of paragraps into the blockquotes.

    However if I do this it does not validate as XHTML because the blockquote does not get closed (& depending on the theme used the page can end up looking a complete mess as a result.)

    After a bit of fiddling about, I thought that I could solve the problem by adding a custom field called brokenquote to denote posts where the blockquote needed closing after the <!--more--> tag.

    However, it works to an extent, but all the tags around this point in the post are still nested incorrectly stopping it validating. Whatever I do the <a> for the continuation text always starts before any of my modified code.

    An example should make it slightly clearer what I mean:

    <div class="postentry">
    <?php $brokenquote = get_post_custom_values("brokenquote");
    if(count($brokenquote) > 0) the_content('Read the rest of this entry �</blockquote>
    else the_content('Read the rest of this entry �'); ?>

    Produces output where the tags are nested like this:

    <a href="link.html">
    Read the rest of this entry �

    Where you can see that the blockquote & a & p tags are all half overlapping one another.

    Any suggestions of the best way to approach this problem would be welcomed.

  2. Scott Reilly
    WordPress & Plugin Dev
    Posted 11 years ago #

    There is a bug report on Mosquito related to this issue (which isn't limited to just the <blockquote> tag: http://mosquito.wordpress.org/view.php?id=178

    The patch attached to that bug may not apply so cleanly as it was created months ago and the WP code has probably changed things up a bit since then, but the approach should still be valid.

  3. mat8iou
    Posted 11 years ago #

    Thanks for that info. I'll have a look at the patch when I have time & see if it works - It counds like a better solution than my kludged together attempt anyway.

  4. mat8iou
    Posted 11 years ago #

    It appears to validate fine now after applying the patch from the post you linked to.

    Many thanks for the advice.

Topic Closed

This topic has been closed to new replies.

About this Topic