Support » Plugin: WP-Matomo (WP-Piwik) » WP-Matomo Widget counts wrong (again)

  • Resolved ralfsteck

    (@ralfsteck)


    Hi, the Widget on my WP start page states:

    Besucher: 4320
    Eindeutige Besucher: 3994
    Page Views: 24229 (Ø 5.6)

    while Matomo says (on 30 days)

    4.311 Besuche
    1 Minuten 35s durchschnittliche Aufenthaltsdauer
    45 % abgesprungene Besucher (Verlassen der Webseite nach einer Seite)
    5,6 Aktionen pro Besuch (Seitenansichten, Downloads, ausgehende Verweise und interne Suchen)
    0,41 s durchschnittliche Generierungszeit
    5.687 Seitenansichten, 5.114 Einmalige Seitenansichten
    […]

    Dothe 24229 page views refer to the 5114 unique page views * 5,6 actions? Does this make sense???

    The page I need help with: [log in to see the link]

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Plugin Author braekling

    (@braekling)

    The endpoint is not delivering the number of page views, so the action count was used (but an action can be more than a page view, I guess you are using & tracking Ajax requests to update your content?). So the correct wording should be “Actions” instead of “Page Views”. (24,229 / 5.6 ~ 4,320)

    <result date="2019-10-21">
       <nb_uniq_visitors>65</nb_uniq_visitors>
       <nb_users>0</nb_users>
       <nb_visits>71</nb_visits>
       <nb_actions>105</nb_actions>
       <nb_visits_converted>0</nb_visits_converted>
       <bounce_count>64</bounce_count>
       <sum_visit_length>1225</sum_visit_length>
       <max_actions>13</max_actions>
       <bounce_rate>90 %</bounce_rate>
       <nb_actions_per_visit>1.5</nb_actions_per_visit>
       <avg_time_on_site>17</avg_time_on_site>
    </result>

    I’ll update the wording with the next release and will try to figure out if I can get the page views as well.

    Hi, thanks, that’s what I thought. Page Views would be cool.

    resolved

    • This reply was modified 8 months, 2 weeks ago by ralfsteck.
Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • The topic ‘WP-Matomo Widget counts wrong (again)’ is closed to new replies.