Support » Plugin: Enlighter - Customizable Syntax Highlighter » Text in back-ticks not rendered as “Enlighter inline code”

  • Hi!
    Love your plugin! But I have a little problem:
    When I write code in back-ticks, it’s automatically converted to an Inline Code rich text component, but not to an Enlighter Inline Code component.

    This way, I have to go through all inline code snippets in my articles and manually replace them with Enlighter Inline Code. Is there any way to have inline code in back-ticks directly convert into an Enlighter Inline Code?

    Thanks!
    Mischa

Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Plugin Author Andi Dittrich

    (@andi-dittrich)

    Gutenberg or ClassicEditor ?

    Generally old posts created with the default “code” tags cannot be converted to EnlighterJS because of the missing language attributes – it has to be done manually.

    As a workaround you can add additional css selectors which are matching these elements – in this case the global default(fallback) language will be used.

    • This reply was modified 10 months, 2 weeks ago by Andi Dittrich.
    Thread Starter quickmischa

    (@quickmischa)

    Thanks for the quick reply!

    It’s the Gutenberg editor, but I’m actually talking about new posts, not old ones.

    We usually write programming-related posts in Markdown and then copy-paste them to the Gutenberg editor. Multiline-code snippets (3 back-ticks) are rendered correctly as Enlighter code block, but inline code (1 back-tick) is not. It’s always rendered as the default WordPress inline code element.

    Plugin Author Andi Dittrich

    (@andi-dittrich)

    as i know there is no possibility to remove this “build-in” Gutenberg feature – maybe you can start a support request to the Gutenberg devs on GitHub

    Thread Starter quickmischa

    (@quickmischa)

    Okay, I see. I might do that. Thanks again for the quick feedback!

Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • The topic ‘Text in back-ticks not rendered as “Enlighter inline code”’ is closed to new replies.