Title: Tables of concern for mixed content errors (http-&gt;https)
Last modified: March 6, 2017

---

# Tables of concern for mixed content errors (http->https)

 *  Resolved [bjf2000](https://wordpress.org/support/users/bjf2000/)
 * (@bjf2000)
 * [9 years, 4 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/tables-of-concern-for-mixed-content-errors-http-https/)
 * We’re exploring two different search&replace plugins to solve the mixed content(
   URL) problem now that we’re using SSL.
 * I did find this:
    [https://codex.wordpress.org/Database_Description](https://codex.wordpress.org/Database_Description)
 * And it suggests wp_posts is the main table, but does that mean we can ignore 
   all the other ones as far as this particular browser warning is concerned? Searching
   tends to be very slow and can sometimes swamp the server, so the fewer tables
   to worry about the better. wp_options in particular is quite large.

Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)

 *  Moderator [James Huff](https://wordpress.org/support/users/macmanx/)
 * (@macmanx)
 * [9 years, 4 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/tables-of-concern-for-mixed-content-errors-http-https/#post-8878022)
 * Other tables may contain content that is embedded as well, like widgets and comments.
 * Try this plugin: [https://wordpress.org/plugins/velvet-blues-update-urls/](https://wordpress.org/plugins/velvet-blues-update-urls/)
 *  Thread Starter [bjf2000](https://wordpress.org/support/users/bjf2000/)
 * (@bjf2000)
 * [9 years, 4 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/tables-of-concern-for-mixed-content-errors-http-https/#post-8878045)
 * Great, so we really have to be concerned with all of them, though wp_options 
   isn’t public-facing, right, so really shouldn’t be a factor?
 * That plugin worries me because it doesn’t have a preview feature for changes,
   like Search & Replace (which has the best preview that I’ve found) and Better
   Search Replace (which people say does a better job in the actual replacing, while
   also letting you ignore GUID).
 *  Moderator [James Huff](https://wordpress.org/support/users/macmanx/)
 * (@macmanx)
 * [9 years, 4 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/tables-of-concern-for-mixed-content-errors-http-https/#post-8878100)
 * All of them, just to be safe.
 * Even though the two plugins you mentioned have a preview function, I still recommend
   backing up first: [https://codex.wordpress.org/WordPress_Backups](https://codex.wordpress.org/WordPress_Backups)
 *  Thread Starter [bjf2000](https://wordpress.org/support/users/bjf2000/)
 * (@bjf2000)
 * [9 years, 4 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/tables-of-concern-for-mixed-content-errors-http-https/#post-8879885)
 * Yes, absolutely. phpMyAdmin works well for us, as opposed to the backup in Search&
   Replace, which seems to stall out and effectively hang up the site. There’s a
   big difference in efficiency in backup methods, it seems.

Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)

The topic ‘Tables of concern for mixed content errors (http->https)’ is closed to
new replies.

 * In: [Fixing WordPress](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/how-to-and-troubleshooting/)
 * 4 replies
 * 2 participants
 * Last reply from: [bjf2000](https://wordpress.org/support/users/bjf2000/)
 * Last activity: [9 years, 4 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/tables-of-concern-for-mixed-content-errors-http-https/#post-8879885)
 * Status: resolved

## Topics

### Topics with no replies

### Non-support topics

### Resolved topics

### Unresolved topics

### All topics
