Rhetorical forums question (8 posts)

  1. Kafkaesqui

    Posted 11 years ago #

    So when are we putting up a Kubrick forum?

  2. Mark (podz)
    Support Maven
    Posted 11 years ago #

    We don't see what I would say is sufficient questions specific to Kubrick to justify another forum do we ?
    Michael has a very good FAQ, and isn't there some sort of flickr / multiply type group too ?

    If such a forum would be useful, then sure, why not but I can't see it being so. For a whole host of reasons I'm not about to go into because to do so would be to loosen lids on cans of worms which are best kept shut, I wouldn't vote for such a forum.

  3. TechGnome
    Posted 11 years ago #

    besides such a forum should be the resposibility of the template owner - and I think this holds true for any template creator - if they want to.


  4. Kafkaesqui

    Posted 11 years ago #

    Gentlemen? Thank you for your input. I'm sure many of us will get something from it. However, two points:

    1. This was a rhetorical question. Didn't your momma ever teach you: never answer rhetorical questions!
    2. This was also little more than a humorous observation on the number of Kubrick threads.

    Let's hope sarcasm isn't dead for 2005. Otherwise I'm in big trouble.

  5. somefool
    Posted 11 years ago #

    Isnt this covered by "Templates and Design"?

  6. Kafkaesqui

    Posted 11 years ago #

    "It's dead, Jim."


  7. somefool
    Posted 11 years ago #

    maybe facetiousness is dead in 2005 ;-)

  8. Kafkaesqui

    Posted 11 years ago #

    The benefit of facetiousness is that it can muddle along on life-support for decades.

Topic Closed

This topic has been closed to new replies.

About this Topic


No tags yet.