Reversing Row Order

Good morning, Tobias and thank you for your quick reply.  It is as I suspected, I need to upgrade the client’s Table Press Plugin to a pro/premium version.  Not a problem and I plan to do so, but the client had an interesting question.  I use Table Press to create pages for each of their clients, for the purpose of inventory management, and I typically set up each Table Press with 150 rows and 12 columns.  When inventory arrives, they enter the details in the row, then below that row, they enter the next item when it is received.  For example, if they happen to have 50 items that arrived, the table would show the first 50 rows filled and 100 blanks rows below the 50 that have already been used.  If 5 more items arrive, they would enter the details and then there would be 95 unused rows.  Now for the question, currently in the example of 150 rows and 50 used, it would leave 100 rows below the first 50 that are empty and ready to be used.  If I reverse the order as I want the newest entry to always be at the top, am I going to have 100 empty rows, then after scrolling down I will see the newest of the 50 already entered?  Or does the customer need to add a few rows at a time and me not set up a table initially with 150 rows?  I hope this isn’t to confusing.

Once again thank you for your quick response. You answered my question perfectly and I did notice that if I want to simply sort the rows by ascending or desending dates, it is an option on the standard Free Plugin, they are currently using. DOes the “paid” version also correct the header row shifting to the right when you scroll down the table?

Thanks, I will get you a screen shot, once I work out the descending issue. I used the date Column, which is what the client wants to sequence by, meaning most recent entry at the top of the table and oldest at the bottom. What I am noticing and I am not why, but some of the other data in the row changes with rows above or velow, resulting in all the information in the row, going across not being 100% as it was. I know this probably sounds crazy,but it is happening. Could it be because not all of their office staff that adds to the table uses the exact date format. Some for example for a date might use or March 9, 2024: 03/09/24, others 03/9/24, others 03/09/2024, etc. DO you think that could make a difference in other columns?

Thanks