That’s an error coming from OpenAI, not AI Engine 🙁
So, if I “set up a paid account” on OpenAI the error should go away?
I am pretty sure, yes 🙂 Personally, I have never seen that error, but I always had a paid account.
Yes, you’re right.
I’ve set a paid account and now I can see the details.
I hope that some competitor (e.g. Google) will arrive soon, so that the prices of APIs will be lowered or that they will put in place a minimum of free monthly credit (as happens when using Google services), otherwise I see it hard to put a chat on a website and pay several dollars a day just to give answers that one would usually give for free by phone or via email in response to a request sent by an electronic form.
Don’t worry about this 🙂 It’s definitely certain that the prices will go down; it’s a new technology, newly implemented, and that needs a lot of resources. Companies need the cash right now but it will probably become more and more affordable, and I believe one day we’ll be running the IA models directly in our own devices directly 🙂
@mickhele
I don’t know if it is your case, but to use ChatGpt as “purely” chat in a website is kinda a waste of time, not to mention related costs. Site owners can achieve similar results by coding an efficient, a lot cheaper and much easier to code chatbot that drives visitors through a well designed path. It’s just my view, but I’m noticing a lot of ppl trying to use AI for purposes other than what it was made for. AI makes sense for a wide range of creative interactions that are not feasable with a simple chatbot, wich “de facto” is a big FAQ section that can also bring sales, if well organized.
I totally with @andrino27.
Another common mistake is to use the chatbot like a “clever” search engine, as a way to redirect to products or certain pages. Actually, a search engine does the job better, for free, and faster.
Personally, I love fine-tuned models. Many users of AI Engine made their own models, and I improved the plugin through their experience. It works really well in many cases. I also made mine, but it’s silly! Like me 😉 It’s actually quite good but it can’t do support yet (I’ll need a lot more training data, but I will try to make a demo soon)
You are right, but fundamentally, this tool would be presented on the websites as a chat. Therefore, before arriving at a clear and precise question, the users would go through a round of useless initial questions, which would then be charged for by OpenAI… if the website has hundreds of visitors a day, multiply how much it would cost a company to use this tool.
It’s the same thing that happens with Google Cloud systems (e.g. Maps); but Google has realised that they have to charge only when very high usage values are reached (I think it’s $100 per month of free credit); otherwise, no small company would use their API… not everyone lives and works in rich countries like the USA or Japan.
Personally, I don’t use it officially and publicly because that wouldn’t cost me too much and I prefer to make my website cleaner and simpler to browse. That said, I soon as my model is well trained, I will definitely propose it on the support page, and I am sure it can help 🙂 Also, we well-trained model with curie works actually very well, and is much cheaper than an untrained davinci.
I also really hope they use the same kind of plans as Google Maps.
Hello!
I consider the fine-tuning of AI to be foolish. My website already knows everything it needs to know without it, as everything that is required is written in the short code.
When a model is fine-tuned, it only becomes simplified from its original form. However, a chatbot is a good thing, and it can be very useful in the offline service sector.
It has already brought me three customers, and now that I have a save function, I can also respond to interested parties who leave me some form of contact information.
