Recent Posts Widget Extended
[resolved] Masonry Layout (6 posts)

  1. sudipta_shaw
    Posted 2 years ago #

    Is it possible to display the thumbnails in a single row (i.e. multi-column) instead of 1 column per row.

    I have a horizontal footer widget where I want to display the thumbnails of my 5 recent posts in a horizontal manner rather than vertical.

    I found "Masonry Layout (experiment)" feature in the description tab of this widget. If I want to have a 3x3 thumbnail masonry layout, is it possible?

    Please advice.



  2. Lordwarz
    Posted 2 years ago #

    I would also like to display this widget horizontally, it would be great to have an option to display this widget horizontally or vertically.

    I'm ganna mess around with the code and see if i can get it to look the way i want it to.

  3. mrpink84
    Posted 1 year ago #

    Anybody able to get something together? I've been rippin my hair out tryin' to figure out a nice horizontal without using columns and offsetting 4 widgets per line by 1, 2, 3, etc.

  4. Satrya
    Posted 1 year ago #

    I'm sorry guys, the feature is not ready for public use ;)

  5. mrpink84
    Posted 1 year ago #

    Aww ok. I was actually asking the community since somebody could've come up with some CSS hacks or restyling to solve the issue. This is an option I would LOVE to see in a future release, Satrya! Thanks!

  6. coralseait
    Posted 1 year ago #


    Perhaps you could style the ul and li (since they have classes) like bootstrap's list-inline?

    essentially if you do similar to this from bootsrap CSS:

    .list-inline {
      padding-left: 0;
      margin-left: -5px;
      list-style: none;
    .list-inline > li {
      display: inline-block;
      padding-right: 5px;
      padding-left: 5px;

    But using rpwe-ul and rpwe-li

    I typically include Boostrap and Font Awesome now in all my WordPress projects and list-inline is wonderful!

Topic Closed

This topic has been closed to new replies.

About this Plugin

About this Topic


No tags yet.