Title: Image optimization issues Last modified: July 22, 2024 --- # Image optimization issues * Resolved [vasek608](https://wordpress.org/support/users/vasek608/) * (@vasek608) * [1 year, 9 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/image-optimization-issues-3/) * The image optimization process starts but is not completing (on quic.cloud side); clean up the unfinished data removes extensive amount of image positions * **Initial situation:** 1 day ago, 200 images were pushed to quic.cloud (for image optimization) but 28 images were not processed. Current image post id position is 43979 (report: LVVQTWQR):[https://i.imgur.com/9FFI80X.png](https://i.imgur.com/9FFI80X.png) * **Issue1:** why 28 images were not processed? I see no error in quick.cloud web portal (in image optimization console). And such situation happens to me almost every day – not all images are processed. The “amount” of unprocessed images differ, sometimes it is 28, sometimes 7 or 18 etc. Just very rarely – all images are processed. If it is data related (ie. some images cannot be optimized), then quick.cloud should show the warning somewhere (either in quic.cloud image optimization console, or in WP). * **Next step taken:** Then I did “clean up unfinished data: 28 images”, to reset the quic.cloud queue. The result is following:[https://i.imgur.com/f6zrPKa.png](https://i.imgur.com/f6zrPKa.png) * **Issue2:** the ‘Current image post id position” got reset (from 43979) to 41879, which is 2100 position backwards. Which is imho wrong. I would expect that resetting happens for much less positions, eg. for 28 (as 28 images were not processed), or for 200 (as whole one request was reset (and each request is 200 images for me)), or for 1000 (as daily allowed quota is 1000 images). But here I ‘lost’ optimized images that were generated for several days. (Report: QOINSKBI) - This topic was modified 1 year, 9 months ago by [vasek608](https://wordpress.org/support/users/vasek608/). * The page I need help with: _[[log in](https://login.wordpress.org/?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwordpress.org%2Fsupport%2Ftopic%2Fimage-optimization-issues-3%2F%3Foutput_format%3Dmd&locale=en_US) to see the link]_ Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total) * Plugin Support [qtwrk](https://wordpress.org/support/users/qtwrk/) * (@qtwrk) * [1 year, 9 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/image-optimization-issues-3/#post-17905749) * for 1) , from your screenshot, it means the images were sent for optm , but has not finished and notify your site to pull it back , you can try clean up and send it again , another possibility is the notification was not made for various reasons , but you can try re-send it again * for 2) that is the post id in the database , it’s not really anything related to image numbers * for example , you uploaded it an image , let’s say it has post id 1000 , then you did something , whatever that is, publish some post , add a few product , have some orders placed by customers …etc , then few days later, you uploaded another image , this image , just saying , will have post id as 2000 , then you will see the position jumps from 1000 to 2000 , despite there is only 2 images involved. - This reply was modified 1 year, 9 months ago by [qtwrk](https://wordpress.org/support/users/qtwrk/). Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total) The topic ‘Image optimization issues’ is closed to new replies. * ![](https://ps.w.org/litespeed-cache/assets/icon-256x256.png?rev=2554181) * [LiteSpeed Cache](https://wordpress.org/plugins/litespeed-cache/) * [Frequently Asked Questions](https://wordpress.org/plugins/litespeed-cache/#faq) * [Support Threads](https://wordpress.org/support/plugin/litespeed-cache/) * [Active Topics](https://wordpress.org/support/plugin/litespeed-cache/active/) * [Unresolved Topics](https://wordpress.org/support/plugin/litespeed-cache/unresolved/) * [Reviews](https://wordpress.org/support/plugin/litespeed-cache/reviews/) * 1 reply * 2 participants * Last reply from: [qtwrk](https://wordpress.org/support/users/qtwrk/) * Last activity: [1 year, 9 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/image-optimization-issues-3/#post-17905749) * Status: resolved