Title: Google complient?
Last modified: August 18, 2016

---

# Google complient?

 *  [bbommarito](https://wordpress.org/support/users/bbommarito/)
 * (@bbommarito)
 * [22 years, 10 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/google-complient/)
 * The one thing that has always driven me batty by the PHP based solutions for 
   blogging out there is that none of them handle google well. Will WordPress manage
   to work with google happily, so google actually goes through the entire site?

Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)

1 [2](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/google-complient/page/2/?output_format=md)
[→](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/google-complient/page/2/?output_format=md)

 *  Anonymous
 * [22 years, 10 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/google-complient/#post-21509)
 * I’m not sure where you have that idea from, but I can assure you a WordPress 
   based blog diesn’t have any inherant problems with search engine crawlers.
    Currently,
   WordPress inherits it’s ‘Search Engine Friendly URLs’ from b2, and they are not
   turned on by default. In future versions we will consider turning on this feature
   by default. There are some more tweaks I would like to do first. I know it will
   work: my own blog (currently a customized b2) [http://zed1.com/b2/](http://zed1.com/b2/)
   has received 36% of it’s human visitors so far this month from search engines.
   With Google, Yahoo, and MSN providing the most hits. Most of those hits are from
   the page one results too. A quick check in a 24 hour log file shows 956 hits 
   from googlebot, 163 hits from inktomi, 172 hits from teoma (ask jeeves), 120 
   from Spinne/2.0 (German search portal), etc. you get the picture. Mike
 *  [zaaba](https://wordpress.org/support/users/zaaba/)
 * (@zaaba)
 * [22 years, 10 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/google-complient/#post-21515)
 * I’m sure this invites a pretty obvious answer, but I’d like to actually hear 
   it from someone to confirm. I currently run a modified b2 blog in which the main
   content is based in an iframe. See [http://www.truedeath.com](http://www.truedeath.com)
   for illus.
    Will that really impair google (or any other search bot)’s ability
   to spider thru my site and index it and list it properly? If yes, are there any
   ways to circumvent this, as I would really like to keep the current design? Thanks
   in advance.
 *  [Tom](https://wordpress.org/support/users/tom/)
 * (@tom)
 * [22 years, 10 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/google-complient/#post-21517)
 * Visit this topic at boardom b2 forums. worked for me using wordpress, just don’t
   attempt it if you dont know php very well.
    [http://www.tidakada.com/board/viewtopic.php?t=1273](http://www.tidakada.com/board/viewtopic.php?t=1273)
   it turns all the query strings “?m=200303” or “/m/200303” and things like the
   categories to “/cat/1/General”. allows google to index it a lot better as it 
   thinks its just another directory – note that you need to be able to use .htaccess(
   therefore apache)
 *  Moderator [Matt Mullenweg](https://wordpress.org/support/users/matt/)
 * (@matt)
 * [22 years, 10 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/google-complient/#post-21537)
 * I agree with Mike with regard to search engines, perhaps you have a misunderstanding
   about how the Googlebot works. Google indexes sites with query strings and has
   for a while now. However, there are a number of other benefits to more elegant
   URLs and that’s something we’re working on.
 *  Anonymous
 * [22 years, 10 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/google-complient/#post-21590)
 * Zaaba: not to be stomping on iframes, but I’m sure you’re aware that Google will
   refer a user to your blog page only, and that can spell trouble for site presentation.
   I’m sure you’d like your blog to be in its rightful place, right?
 *  [zaaba](https://wordpress.org/support/users/zaaba/)
 * (@zaaba)
 * [22 years, 10 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/google-complient/#post-21613)
 * gaius: Point noted! I now realise that with CSS I can achieve sorta the same 
   effect. And plus, I can make my page XHTML compliant if I wanted to. Will be 
   redesigning pretty soon. The learning curve in the beginning I admit is quite
   steep for me (the box model).
    BTW, will WordPress be implementing the hack that
   Tom mentioned? As in reducing the ?m=… parts of the url to /cat/1/general form?
 *  Moderator [Matt Mullenweg](https://wordpress.org/support/users/matt/)
 * (@matt)
 * [22 years, 10 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/google-complient/#post-21614)
 * We’re actually doing something much cooler. 🙂
 *  [zaaba](https://wordpress.org/support/users/zaaba/)
 * (@zaaba)
 * [22 years, 10 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/google-complient/#post-21618)
 * Ooh. It *would* help if you could enlighten us on that 😛 I’m sure the rest of
   us would like to know…
 *  Moderator [Matt Mullenweg](https://wordpress.org/support/users/matt/)
 * (@matt)
 * [22 years, 10 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/google-complient/#post-21620)
 * Sure. Basically there are going to be three types of permalinks, the first being
   the current querystring style, the second using just the ID of the post (like/
   archives/123), and the third being a full date followed by keywords, like /2003/
   04/21/this-is-a-post-title .
 *  [gijs](https://wordpress.org/support/users/gijs/)
 * (@gijs)
 * [22 years, 10 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/google-complient/#post-21623)
 * any idea when to expect this integrated in wordpress?
    Think many would be interested…
   I tried to figure out the discussion at [http://www.tidakada.com/board/viewtopic.php?t=1273](http://www.tidakada.com/board/viewtopic.php?t=1273),
   but it’s too fragmented. Can anyone post some step-by-step instructions for wordpress?
   🙂 🙂
 *  [bdjohns1](https://wordpress.org/support/users/bdjohns1/)
 * (@bdjohns1)
 * [22 years, 10 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/google-complient/#post-21781)
 * Ok, I just upgraded myself over to 0.71, and I’ve noticed that the archives file
   went away (as well as b2archives.php. How do we configure /-type URLs now, since
   it seems as if the b2 instructions over at tidakada.com no longer apply?
    If 
   it’s as simple as changing just those three lines in b2config.php, that’d be 
   ideal. Otherwise, if one of the gurus could post a decent set of instructions,
   that would be great.
 *  [bdjohns1](https://wordpress.org/support/users/bdjohns1/)
 * (@bdjohns1)
 * [22 years, 9 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/google-complient/#post-22015)
 * I’m bumping this back up, since no one bothered anwering the question – how do
   we implement the tidakada fix w/o the archives file?
 *  [Mike Little](https://wordpress.org/support/users/mikelittle/)
 * (@mikelittle)
 * [22 years, 9 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/google-complient/#post-22018)
 * Hi,
    The functionality which was in the file b2archives.php is now in the function
   get_archives() in b2template.functions.php But in order to get consistent search
   engine friendly URLs a lot more than just the changes from b2archives are needed.
   We *will* be adding this to WordPress, perhaps it’s worth waiting? Mike
 *  [kensav](https://wordpress.org/support/users/kensav/)
 * (@kensav)
 * [21 years, 7 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/google-complient/#post-22213)
 * Has anything been added to the current version of WP that makes this software
   more SE friendly?
    I have a client who NEEDS to have his webpages .html and no
   scripting on the page. Can this be done with WP?
 *  [Sushubh](https://wordpress.org/support/users/sushubh/)
 * (@sushubh)
 * [21 years, 7 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/google-complient/#post-22214)
 * dude, i use WP almost as a SEO tool… And don’t find google having any issues 
   with it.

Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)

1 [2](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/google-complient/page/2/?output_format=md)
[→](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/google-complient/page/2/?output_format=md)

The topic ‘Google complient?’ is closed to new replies.

 * In: [Everything else WordPress](https://wordpress.org/support/forum/miscellaneous/)
 * 16 replies
 * 11 participants
 * Last reply from: [donster](https://wordpress.org/support/users/donster/)
 * Last activity: [21 years, 7 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/google-complient/page/2/#post-22217)
 * Status: not resolved

## Topics

### Topics with no replies

### Non-support topics

### Resolved topics

### Unresolved topics

### All topics
