Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Hi Laura,
    Here is an extract of the GDPR (See https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679&from=FR for full text).

    Art. 26 – The principles of data protection should apply to any information concerning an identified or identifiable natural person. Personal data which have undergone pseudonymisation, which could be attributed to a natural person by the use of additional information should be considered to be information on an identifiable natural person. To determine whether a natural person is identifiable, account should be taken of all the means reasonably likely to be used, such as singling out, either by the controller or by another person to identify the natural person directly or indirectly. To ascertain whether means are reasonably likely to be used to identify the natural person, account should be taken of all objective factors, such as the costs of and the amount of time required for identification, taking into consideration the available technology at the time of the processing and technological developments. The principles of data protection should therefore not apply to anonymous information, namely information which does not relate to an identified or identifiable natural person or to personal data rendered anonymous in such a manner that the data subject is not or no longer identifiable. This Regulation does not therefore concern the processing of such anonymous information, including for statistical or research purposes.

    As from my understanding (I’m not a layer), anonymous statistics are not considered as personal data and are therefore not submitted to consent.

    But Art. 156 says – …Member States should provide for appropriate safeguards for the processing of personal data for archiving purposes in the public interest, scientific or historical research purposes or statistical purposes. Member States should be authorised to provide, under specific conditions and subject to appropriate safeguards for data subjects, specifications and derogations with regard to the information requirements and rights to rectification, to erasure, to be forgotten, to restriction of processing, to data portability, and to object when processing personal data for archiving purposes in the public interest, scientific or historical research purposes or statistical purposes. The conditions and safeguards in question may entail specific procedures for data subjects to exercise those rights if this is appropriate in the light of the purposes sought by the specific processing along with technical and organisational measures aimed at minimising the processing of personal data in pursuance of the proportionality and necessity principles. The processing of personal data for scientific purposes should also comply with other relevant legislation such as on clinical trials.
    And Art. 162 – Where personal data are processed for statistical purposes, this Regulation should apply to that processing. Union or Member State law should, within the limits of this Regulation, determine statistical content, control of access, specifications for the processing of personal data for statistical purposes and appropriate measures to safeguard the rights and freedoms of the data subject and for ensuring statistical confidentiality. Statistical purposes mean any operation of collection and the processing of personal data necessary for statistical surveys or for the production of statistical results. Those statistical results may further be used for different purposes, including a scientific research purpose. The statistical purpose implies that the result of processing for statistical purposes is not personal data, but aggregate data, and that this result or the personal data are not used in support of measures or decisions regarding any particular natural person.

    I find it odd that the conditional tense is used in those 2 latest articles. But it may explain why the French competent supervisory authority (https://www.cnil.fr/professionnel) allows to block the sending of statistics based on the cookie consent. This latest point has huge consequence on traffic metrics as I already experienced.

    Beside this, you should explain in a policy document what data you collect, its purpose,… as the visitor should know what’s going on with its personal data.

    Hope this help you
    Domi

    Plugin Author Moove Agency

    (@mooveagency)

    Hello,

    Thanks for using our plugin!

    Unfortunately, we’re not able to comment on whether GA with anonymised IP addresses is GDPR compliant or not.

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • The topic ‘Google Analytics with anonymization’ is closed to new replies.