Hey there,
and thanks for your post.
Did you check your post with Googles Structured Data Test Tool? Are there any errors and/or other schemas that you’re using?
You can also share an URL and I can have a look.
Hi Florian,
thanks for your reaction.
(I would have contacted you before the review, but it was not easy 😉
Yes, google did not find errors, just warnings (e.g. that some fields are empty, like recipe video). No, only recipe schema via your plugin.
URL is http://www.martinaldag.de/2021/05/28/mangcoco-daiquiri/
or a more recent one
http://www.martinaldag.de/2021/06/10/immortalsnectar/
I just tested a bit more and found out it also depends on the exact search term, e.g. search for “mango coco daiquiri” does not show textual schema info, but a search for “mango coconut daiquiri” suddenly shows the ingredients text.
Similar for the second link:
if I search for “immortals nectar”, no schema data shown, but if I search for “immortals nectar cocktail”, then the ingredients text is shown. The recipe image is always missing there though..
Hey there,
and thanks for going back! 😉 Love to find out more about the ups and downs when using the plugin.
(I would have contacted you before the review, but it was not easy 😉
Oh really? An e-mail would have sufficed 😉
Well.. if you just get warnings, that’s alright. Your Rich Snippet should appear anyway. Just make sure there are no (red) errors. Read more about it here: https://rich-snippets.io/errors-and-warnings-on-googles-structured-data-test-tool/
Of course you should fill as much properties as you can. However, that’s not always possible.
I just tested a bit more and found out it also depends on the exact search term,
Absolutely! It always depends on Google (not really on your snippet).
Greetings
Flo
