Dissatisfaction with new "codex"
-
I’ve been noticing a trend – the codex is being replaced by a new form of documentation that’s not nearly as good.
The old codex does two valuable things extremely well:
– Make it very clear exactly what the available arguments are for functions
– Show (sometimes multiple) great starter code examplesThe new “code reference” often fails at both of these things.
Good from Codex:
https://codex.wordpress.org/Function_Reference/register_post_type
Bad from Developer:
https://developer.wordpress.org/reference/functions/add_meta_box/The new code reference’s inclusion of “source” and “user-contributed notes” is not as useful as the way the codex handled it. The “user-contributed notes” are not authoritative, and are often quirky or for unusual situations, so a function often is missing the basic starter correct example that we see in the codex.
Is it too late to improve the new code reference to be at least as awesome as the codex?
- The topic ‘Dissatisfaction with new "codex"’ is closed to new replies.