Hyper Cache
Difference between Hyper and Hyper extended? (3 posts)

  1. tempor
    Posted 3 years ago #

    I ve been using Hyper Cache in the past until it suddently stopped working and updating and switched over to Hyper Cache Extended.

    Now I just found that Hyper Cache is active again.

    My question: what is the difference between the two?


  2. mbrsolution
    Posted 3 years ago #

    Hello tempor, have you found any differences between the two? I am also curious to find out what it the major difference apart from the fact that one controls the server CPU usage and the other doesn't.

    I have also notice that you are also using DB Cache Reloaded Fix in combination. Is this still working for you?

    Kind regards

  3. tempor
    Posted 3 years ago #

    Hi mbrsolution,

    I haven't used the old hyper cache again since it was broken (it was abandoned at the time) so I cannot offer you any comparison between the two.

    Hyper Cache Extended has a field which allows you to define a point at which either the cache generation or the cache mechanism is turned off (it is not defined by the author which of the two).

    Concerning the Hyper Cache Extended + DB Cache Reloaded Fix combo it still rules my friend. Some tips from my experience though:

    -For Hyper cache you get the best benefits if you configure it for very very long expiring times (months). CMS sites get the most benefit.

    -For the db cache you really feel the difference the more dynamic the site is (meaning more DB queries). It is still helping in a CMS enviroment.

    Best regards

Topic Closed

This topic has been closed to new replies.

About this Plugin

  • Hyper Cache
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Support Threads
  • Reviews

About this Topic