Developer abuses image sizes

  • SamTyurenkov

    (@samtyurenkov)


    5 years, 3 months ago

    I’m unhappy with the solution, it does not offer proper inclusion for mass optimization and you always have to optimize the images you don’t need. E.g. you only want to optimize the homepage images, and there is no way to select them. Also, there is no way to select only original images, even if you deselect all thumbnails it still finds some 3-4 other sizes which you cannot exclude from mass optimization.

    Per image pricing is too greedy for that, considering you are using your own server resources.

    Plugin has very bad UX

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Plugin Author nosilver4u

    (@nosilver4u)

    5 years, 3 months ago

    Hi Sam, if there are sizes not available for exclusion, it is because your theme or plugin isn’t using the standard methods to register those sizes. I’ll be replying to your email response shortly, looks like it didn’t come in before we closed for the weekend on Friday.

    Also, the pricing is exactly what it is because you are NOT using your own server resources.

    If you have any suggestions on improving the UX, I’d be glad to hear them also (you’ll have our email shortly).

    Thread Starter SamTyurenkov

    (@samtyurenkov)

    5 years, 3 months ago

    I believe it is of your interest to properly handle situations where theme or plugin doesn’t register images. You overcharge your customers because of someone else’s fault.

    Since you charge per image, this is your bottleneck not to give an extremely effective tool for selecting images.

    Also I do not understand why do you release multiple plugins with similar functionality, like imsanity?

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • The topic ‘Developer abuses image sizes’ is closed to new replies.