Thanks for getting in touch.
This is usually a case for our support forum. Giving us a 1-star rating because of this is unjustified.
Regarding your request: you have recognized it correctly – the syntax of the mentioned languages does not use spaces (and therefore cannot be taken into account by our matching algorithm). We are aware of this problem. In principle, we could enable the behavior, but this would affect the full functionality of “space-based” languages.
We may be able to provide a custom mode or add-on that enables this mode in the future.
I’ve added this thread to our backlog and would leave you a note here on the forum as soon as there are updates on it.
May I ask you to adjust your rating to a more neutral level?
Moderator
Jan Dembowski
(@jdembowski)
Forum Moderator and Brute Squad
No @internallinkjuicer do not ask for this. And do not modlook this topic again.
May I ask you to adjust your rating to a more neutral level?
This is 100% valid feedback. I know it is because you said so.
Regarding your request: you have recognized it correctly – the syntax of the mentioned languages does not use spaces (and therefore cannot be taken into account by our matching algorithm). We are aware of this problem. In principle, we could enable the behavior, but this would affect the full functionality of “space-based” languages.
There is no reason for the user to update their review.
Thanks for your feedback @internallinkjuicer . The plugin deserves five stars really.
Hope a rapid update to support CJK,I think I will buy the pro version if the problem solved.:)
May I ask the progress of supporting CJK? We are waiting….:)
