I don’t see a difference between the page with and without AO, could you make a screenshot and put it up somewhere for me to compare? Oh, and which browser are you using?
frank
Hi Frank,
I´m using Firefox or Safari on Mac OS. All are the actual versions.
If you look for example at this link:
http://oldtimer-veranstaltung.de/service/eisenbahn-1978-von-bruchhausen-vilsen-nach-asendorf/
You see under the photo-gallery a Google Map. the Google Map is 730 px width and the photo gallery over it not.
If you use the same link with ….?ao_noptimize=1 at the end of the link to see which css is choosen, the pictures display with 730 px.
The picture on the top of the page has width 730 px, too.
Thanks for help
mustermann
Not entirely sure, but it seems the width is set using javascript. Try excluding jquery.bmoGallery.js (and jquery.js as well, as jquery.bmoGallery.js will require jquery.js to function).
frank
Hi Frank,
thank you for your help.
1) With these two *js no problem to display on iPhone and iPad Safari browsers!
2) To exclude jquery.js and jquery.bmoGallery.js did not help on Firefox and Safari on MAC OS X and it works on iPhone and iPad Safari.
3) I have disable Autopimize and all works fine.
It is a little bit strange waht happens …
mustermann
entirely possible you also have to exclude the plugin’s CSS. ideally you’d ask the developer what his plugins does to set the width of the output (probably a combination of CSS + JS).
frank
Hi Frank,
I will ask the author of the plugin.
Thank you for help
mustermann