No need to use Speedbooster because WPFC has the features of the Speedbooster.
These are the features I want to use from Speedbooster:
Remove query strings
Lazy load images to improve speed
Removes extra Font Awesome styles
Remove RSD Link
Remove WordPress Shortlink
Remove Adjacent Posts Links
Remove Windows Manifest
Remove the WordPress Version
Remove all rss feed links
Unless I am missing something, WPFC does not offer any of those. Furthermore, whether a feature exists in WPFC or not doesn’t necessarily mean a user will prefer it for various reasons. If there is no actual conflict (my original question), shouldn’t both plugins be allowed to be used. Maybe a warning that certain features can conflict would be useful (perhaps with a link to a FAQ entry explaining the potential conflicts) but not one that says the plugin needs to be deactivated.
Also, I am investigating Autoptimize but I didn’t notice any warning for using that. Wouldn’t that also present a possible conflict if you use all the WPFC features?
They are not important features. Just “Lazy Load” is useful. and you can use another plugin for “Lazy Load”.
You marked this thread as resolved but with respect I disagree. You are deciding what is and is not an important feature and which plugin a user can choose to achieve those features. And for what reason, exactly? Because there MAY be a conflict if not setup correctly. I think that is wrong and you should consider changing your plugin rather than telling others what plugin they should or shouldn’t use if there isn’t an avoidable conflict. Plus, you are being arbitrary in your warning – why warn about one plugin but not another (Speedbooster vs. Autoptimize)?
@ mojamba, Speedbooster and WPFC do not work properly together.
Please explain why that is the case. If I decide to only use WPFC for actual cache (no other features), shuldn’t it work just fine with Speedbooster or similar plugins (BWP Minify, Autoptimize, etc.)?
WPFC does not work when Speedbooster is active. I don’t know why. Autoptimize works with wpfc.
That seems strange, but thanks for the clarifying.
