Viewing 6 replies - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • I’m not sure what you mean by “Not fully functional”.

    Users Ultra is fully functional according to all who have been involved in using this Beta.

    No, this doesn’t need BuddPress. What is the problem you are having?

    We are more than happy to assist where we are able to assist, but you haven’t provided any information that would help us to help you.

    We have a very active support forums which you can find a link to in the Frequently Asked Questions.

    We do run into a few bugs from time to time, and we are very quick to address them. If you would like to participate in the forums, we will be most appreciative and very willing to help.

    Thanks for your inquiry. 🙂

    Thread Starter AKMARK5000

    (@akmark5000)

    I’m looking into my problem (going to take a while though). I know there is no requirement of buddy press, so that helps me. I already registered at the other forums, so, I guess I am all set for now. Thanks for the quick response. … and yes, this is a really good plugin, that is why I am pursuing the matter. Thanks again.

    Thread Starter AKMARK5000

    (@akmark5000)

    I went through testing each plugin just to make sure there weren’t plugin conflicts… seems there was!

    JS & CSS Script Optimizer
    Features: Combine all scripts into the single file, Pack scripts using PHP version of the Dean Edwards’s JavaScript Packer, Move all JavaScripts to the bottom, Combine all CSS scripts into the single file, Minify CSS files (remove comments, tabs, spaces, newlines).
    Version 0.2.9 | By Yevhen Kotelnytskyi | Visit plugin site

    I didn’t think it was actually working, so I just deleted it. But thought I’d let you know.

    Is there a premium version of “users ultra?” So far, I really like this free version and was planning on donating anyway if my website makes a little money.

    I personally haven’t ever had much success with plugins that attempt to pack and combine files from other plugins and move everything either to the header or footer.

    However, it might be worth taking a look at. Most of those type of plugins have an “exclude” feature so that if there is a problem, certain plugins can be excluded from their process.

    We are currently working on our pro version. It is going to be substantially more feature enhanced and enriched (as a pro version should be). But we are going to also continue to add features to the free version as well.

    We don’t want to have our free version lacking in significant features needed by those who choose to use it. I personally don’t like it when plugins offer a free version and it is so restrictive that it really isn’t worth using unless I pay to have the basic functionality a plugin of whatever sort it is, should have.

    We recognize that some people are not able to immediately purchase a pro version of something, so we want to help as much as we can to get them on a good start. Then when they can afford to step up, they can do it comfortably.

    We want to give a great value to our free version and a great value to our pro version. That’s the way we like things and that’s the way we believe people would like them as well.

    With what is already offered in the free version, one might only imagine what we are planning for the pro.. 🙂

    We think people will be very happy when they see the pro version. But, it’s not quite ready for release.

    We are happy you like what we have so far.

    Thanks

    Thread Starter AKMARK5000

    (@akmark5000)

    OOOPS… I forgot to mark this as RESOLVED last night.

    Thanks.

    Welcome to the forums as well… We look forward to working with you.

Viewing 6 replies - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • The topic ‘Not fully functional’ is closed to new replies.