my WP1.5 adds this when linking commenter name to his website:
[code]rel="external nofollow"[/code]
Shouldn't it be: rel=nofllow ?
Is it a new change in the nofollow tag that google started?
and does it work the same?
rel="external nofollow" (9 posts)
-
sallam
Posted 6 years ago # -
rel="external" = "This is an external link" (most are)
rel="nofollow" = "Do not catalogue this link"
rel="external nofollow" = "This is an external link, do not catalogue it."
-
The interesting thing is that even if it is pingback from another post in your site, it simply treats it as external!
Personally I prefer to disable nofollow via plugin.
-
greatbananas
Posted 6 years ago #[code]rel="external nofollow"[/code]
So is having two variables in there OK?
Also I still don't understand why it needs to be labeled as "external"
Thanks.
-
So is having two variables in there OK?
Yes. See: http://wordpress.org/support/topic/30307#post-171261
-
"So is having two variables in there OK?"
Yeah: "The value of this attribute is a space-separated list of link types."
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/links.html#adef-rel -
seidon
Posted 6 years ago #Ok, so does the Google Bot (the one that actually indexes) follow rel="external nofollow" ?!?
And or does it not follow links with that code in it?
David Martinez
http://www.seidon.com/ -
-
-
"Ok, so does the Google Bot (the one that actually indexes) follow rel="external nofollow" ?!?"
It follows such links, it just does not weight them for SEO purposes. That meant that Googlebot continued to index everything, but it would not appeal to spammers seeking to generate zillions of links in the hope of upping their PR. Flawed argument in the first place though.
Topic Closed
This topic has been closed to new replies.
