sonicworks
Member
Posted 4 years ago #
What's the deal with this?
W3C CSS Validator results:
9 .cpYearNavigation, .cpMonthNavigation Value Error : vertical-align center is not a vertical-align value : center
61 TD.cpCurrentDate Value Error : border-width only 0 can be a length. You must put an unit after your number : 1
65 TD.cpCurrentDateDisabled Value Error : border-width only 0 can be a length. You must put an unit after your number : 1
92 #datepicker Property layer-background-color doesn't exist : white
104 * html #datepicker iframe Parse Error :mask()
URI : /wordpress/wp-content/plugins/contactforms/styling/cforms.css
61 .cform label Value Error : display -moz-inline-box is not a display value : -moz-inline-box
145 span.reqtxt, span.emailreqtxt Value Error : display -moz-inline-box is not a display value : -moz-inline-box
http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/cforms/
This is a resolved issue. Please update to the latest cforms version!
--
Please also visit the cforms forum »
sonicworks
Member
Posted 4 years ago #
Nope, still broken...
wp-content/plugins/cforms/styling/shiny_style.css
78 .cform label Value Error : display -moz-inline-box is not a display value : -moz-inline-box
150 .cform select Value Error : width Too many values or values are not recognized : 183 px
170 span.reqtxt, span.emailreqtxt Value Error : display -moz-inline-box is not a display value : -moz-inline-box
This and this might help to understand the background of "-moz-inline-box". Whether or not the validator whines about it, it follows a best practice.
--
Please also visit the cforms forum »
darknailblue
Member
Posted 3 years ago #
To be honest I think that the W3C validation best practice is far more important than a browser specific best practice even if it is for a gecko based one. Many would agree especially when working for a standards compliant development firm.
But - fear not!! The desired effect can be accomplished by killing the -moz-inline-box display property and floating it to the left.
I didn't do this with the shiny CSS one but I did with the minimal CSS and it worked like a charm.
I really hope this is fixed in the next release because some people (including a co-worker of mine) refuse to use this phenomenal product because of the validation issues.
