WordPress.org

Ready to get started?Download WordPress

Forums

Patch: Slight cleanup on wp-admin.css (3 posts)

  1. sisob
    Member
    Posted 10 years ago #

    The following is a patch against cvs head on wp-admin.css
    It's not massive but implements some of the cleanup in I mentioned in
    http://wordpress.org/support/4/1357
    The change is pretty much to remove a lot of the visual clutter from the
    admin interface and the annoying mouseover as you move around the
    page.
    Maybe someone could review this bfore 1.0
    Thanks
    Mark
    Index: wp-admin.css
    ===================================================================
    RCS file: /cvsroot/cafelog/wordpress/wp-admin/wp-admin.css,v
    retrieving revision 1.25
    diff -u -r1.25 wp-admin.css
    --- wp-admin.css 28 Dec 2003 11:44:05 -0000 1.25
    +++ wp-admin.css 28 Dec 2003 18:17:19 -0000
    @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
    }
    fieldset {
    - border: 1px solid #ccc;
    + border: 0px solid #ccc;
    padding: 2px;
    }
    @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@
    }
    fieldset:hover {
    - border: 1px solid #999;
    + border: 0px solid #999;
    }
    form, label input {
    @@ -191,9 +191,9 @@
    }
    #adminmenu, #adminmenu2 {
    - border-bottom: 2px solid #5a5a5a;
    + border-bottom: 0px solid #5a5a5a;
    margin: 2px;
    - padding: 0 2px;
    + padding: 0px 2px 10px 0;
    }
    #adminmenu2 {
    @@ -268,6 +268,7 @@
    }
    #poststuff {
    + padding-top: 5px;
    margin-right: 11em;
    }

  2. Ryan Boren
    WordPress Dev
    Posted 10 years ago #

    In my idle opinion, that looks much better. Just removing the fieldset borders and mouseovers makes a big difference. Those focus rings are rather noisy and distracting.

  3. sisob
    Member
    Posted 10 years ago #

    If this is accepted there are some more spacing issues on the other pages that i could supply a patch for. As you can see I added 5px to the post page - would prob need to be done for the rest.

Topic Closed

This topic has been closed to new replies.

About this Topic

Tags

No tags yet.