mojorob,
When I said "I have 100s of logins.." I overestimated, out of irritation. Though I probably have more than 20 and less than 40.
That difference not withstanding, that info is 'stored' inside e-mails. (gmail is my lone "while not at work" e-mail client).
I 'store' those e-mails the same way I store anything other e-mails. And while I have never been asked, I wouldnt tell anyone who did ask, anything different.
I work for a host; we reset passwords constantly through support tickets (Kayoko) -- I have access to my work email and those same tickets through my Palm. I dont delete those emails, just because they may have passwords stored in them.
My e-mail, in both instances is cleared because I'm cleaning up (in the case of gmail, I just recently organized over 500 emails), or because, in the case of my Palm, I use a setting that only allows so many emails before they are automatically deleted from my Palm.
In other words, I dont delete something simply because there is a password in it, no.
Frankly, the threaded nature of gmail, and the amount of emails that are typically swapped before I ever do anything on a site, makes that nearly impossible, without deleting every email within the thread. AND, for what its worth, after having helped someone, I am occasionally asked back to do something else -- having those old messages has proven handy, in that case.
I tell people one important thing before I ever do anything on their site (paid for or not) and that is that their site wont be compromised as a result of my having that info, and I would happily make that claim whether the info were stored locally OR stored remotely.
I trust gmail with my own passwords, consequently I trust gmail with ALL passwords. Blind trust? Sure, perhaps. But Im a google lover.
And, I will admit, that I expect some of that responsibility to fall back on the site owner.. ie their changing if the password. A good deal of the people are wise enough to create separate login credentials for just me --
The difference between me, and I suspect, Janet, would come down to intent.
It's not a crime to store information, and you might be surprised (or maybe not) at how much is 'out there'. While, arguably, what I, and many others do, is insecure, prima facie, it's done, and eventually, someone has to be trusted -- in the digital age, thats a fact of life.