WordPress.org

Ready to get started?Download WordPress

Forums

Bad Behavior
Bad Behavior WPMU updated (13 posts)

  1. treydock
    Member
    Posted 2 years ago #

    I have updated my modification of Bad Behavior to incorporate all the changes made in 2.1.15. You can find information here, http://itscblog.tamu.edu/bad-behavior-wpmu/.

    This modification is the exact same as the original except it is designed for Multisite installs.

    http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/bad-behavior/

  2. Ovidiu
    Member
    Posted 2 years ago #

    thanks!

  3. Ovidiu
    Member
    Posted 2 years ago #

    hey trey, I tried to leave a comment on your website asking if you have a newer version seeing that BB is at 2.2.1 right now but it seems as if my comment didn't go through...

  4. treydock
    Member
    Posted 2 years ago #

    Hm strange that the comment didn't go through. Never saw one for approval and didn't see it blocked by Akismet.

    In the next few days I'll have the updated version out.

    - Trey

  5. Ovidiu
    Member
    Posted 2 years ago #

    it was very strange - comment went through, then it disapeared and I saw: "-1 Comments" !?

    Tried refreshing but it didn't help.
    Anyway, thanks for keeping this plugin updated.

  6. treydock
    Member
    Posted 2 years ago #

    Try leaving another comment and making note of the exact time. That concerns me that it may be keeping others from commenting.

    Thanks
    - Trey

  7. Ovidiu
    Member
    Posted 2 years ago #

    Sure, check this out: http://screencast.com/t/QQEApoqOp
    And after pressing the post comment button this happens: http://screencast.com/t/UirdQKzIj

    time: a few seconds before the timp stamp of this post ;-)

  8. treydock
    Member
    Posted 2 years ago #

    I've uploaded bad-behavior-wpmu-2.2.2 , see here, http://itscblog.tamu.edu/bad-behavior-wpmu-2-2-2-released/

    - Trey

  9. Ovidiu
    Member
    Posted 2 years ago #

    thanks :-)

  10. Ovidiu
    Member
    Posted 2 years ago #

    oh, sorry forgot to ask: did you chat with the guy managing BB? Is there a chance he'll integrate your multi-site changes into the main version?

  11. Ovidiu
    Member
    Posted 2 years ago #

    hm, just realized the multi-site issues are listed under the known errors page: http://bad-behavior.ioerror.us/documentation/known-issues/

  12. Ovidiu
    Member
    Posted 2 years ago #

    found an IP range that needs whitelisting but my comment on BB author's page is awaiting moderation so I'll post it here too:

    I think I have found a legitimate service in need of whitelisting.
    My BB log shows 29 similar entries:

    209.85.224.95
    iy-in-f95.1e100.net
    
    2012-02-28 15:47:57
    
    IP address found on http:BL blacklist 
    
    http:BL:
    Suspicious
    Comment Spammer
    Threat level 40
    Age 15 days
    
    POST /?pushpress=hub HTTP/1.1
    User-Agent: AppEngine-Google; (+http://code.google.com/appengine; appid: pshb-service)
    Host: sarcasticu.zice.ro
    Accept-Encoding: gzip
    Connection: close
    
    hub_verify: sync
    hub_topic: http://sarcasticu.zice.ro/wp-cron.php?doing_wp_cron=1330439523
    hub_callback: https://pshb-service.appspot.com/subscriber/492035eb08333b9418be0029c4409b8a7851be67
    hub_mode: subscribe
    hub_verify_token: fa235e7f55db84060d678216fae55e3ebbc76385
    hub_secret: 0yBpHASAtS1kn2Rj1bVdYY--d2vOZevzUHul0xeXjA-ls2PCZLrVHzNcy2YiDkNMdDvqRzfjHTt-oCD4gP33WOM0HvklCcwjEbRgRK7HH4mb83tRJQlmLxPUZ5Ex1rvX

    Now I know it http:BL: lists this IP as suspicious but a whois returns:

    NetRange:       209.85.128.0 - 209.85.255.255
    CIDR:           209.85.128.0/17
    OriginAS:
    NetName:        GOOGLE
    NetHandle:      NET-209-85-128-0-1
    Parent:         NET-209-0-0-0-0
    NetType:        Direct Allocation
    RegDate:        2006-01-13
    Updated:        2012-02-24
    Ref:            http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-209-85-128-0-1
    
    OrgName:        Google Inc.
    OrgId:          GOGL
    Address:        1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
    City:           Mountain View
    StateProv:      CA
    PostalCode:     94043
    Country:        US
    RegDate:        2000-03-30
    Updated:        2011-09-24
    Ref:            http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/GOGL

    So it seems to be indeed a legitimate Google service. For now I have white-listed this IP range but would you please look into this?

  13. Ovidiu
    Member
    Posted 2 years ago #

    Got an answer from the plugin author. Will post it here so he doesn't need to respond all over the place:

    Ovidiu, this block is due to your subscription to Project Honey Pot.

    The root cause is that spammers are using Google App Engine to deliver spam, and so legitimate services which also use Google App Engine are affected.

    To which I answered:

    Ah, I understand. I was just worried because this request looked like a perfectly legitimate request.

Topic Closed

This topic has been closed to new replies.

About this Plugin

About this Topic